When the conclusion of randomized comparative experiment is that there is "no significant difference" in the response, what does this mean?
When the conclusion of randomized comparative experiment is that there is "no significant difference" in the response, what does this mean?
|
|||||||||
correct option is :
It means that the difference in the response between the groups could be explained by chance variation.
When the conclusion of randomized comparative experiment is that there is "no significant difference" in the...
The following data are from a completely randomized design. In the following calculations, use a = 0.05. Treatment Treatment Treatment 88 77 ł / 51 58 132.67 113.33 54.00 a. Use analysis of variance to test for a significant difference among the means of the three treatments. Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degrees Mean Square p-value (to whole number of (to whole number) bers (to 2 decimals) to - decimals (to 3 decimals) Freedom Treatments Error Total The p-value...
In a completely randomized design, 12 experimental units were used for the first treatment, 15 for the second treatment, and 20 for the third treatment. Complete the following analysis of variance (to 2 decimals, if necessary). If the answer is zero enter "o". Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Square F p -value Treatments 1,200 C 20 600 Error Total 1,900 At a .05 level of significance, is there a significant difference between the treatments? The...
In a completely randomized experimental design, 15 experimental units were used for the first treatment, 10 experimental units for the second treatment, and 15 experimental units for the third treatment, 12 in fourth. Part of the ANOVA table for this experiment is shown below. Source of Sum of Degrees of Mean Variation Squares Freedom Square F Between Treatments _____? _____? _____? 3.0 Error (Within Treatments) _____? _____? 6 Total _____? _____? a. Fill in all the blanks in the above...
In a completely randomized design,12 experimental units were used for the first treatment, 15 for thesecond treatment, and 20 for the third treatment. Complete thefollowing analysis of variance (to 2 decimals, if necessary). Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Square F Treatments 1200 Error Total 1600 At a .05 level of significance, isthere a significant difference between the treatments? P -value is? Less than 0.1 Between 0.1 and 0.25 Between 0.25 and 0.05 Between 0.05 and...
The following data are from a completely randomized design. Treatment Treatment Treatment A B C 32 47 34 30 46 37 30 47 36 26 49 37 32 51 41 Sample mean 30 48 37 Sample variance 6 4 6.5 At the = .05 level of significance, can we reject the null hypothesis that the means of the three treatments are equal? Compute the values below (to 1 decimal, if necessary). Sum of Squares, Treatment Sum of Squares, Error Mean...
In a completely randomized design, 12 experimental units were used for the first treatment, 15 for the second treatment, and 20 for the third treatment. Complete the following analysis of variance (to 2 decimals, if necessary). Round p-value to four decimal places. If your answer is zero enter "0". Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Square F p-value Treatments 1,300 --?-- --?-- ----?----- ---?------ ----?---- Error --?-- --?-- --?-- ----?----- ---?------ ----?---- Total 2,000 ...
In a completely randomized design, 12 experimental units were used for the first treatment, 15 for the second treatment, and 20 for the third treatment. Complete the following analysis of variance (to 2 decimals, if necessary). Round p-value to four decimal places. If your answer is zero enter "0". Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Square p-value Treatments 1,100 Error Total 1,900 At a .05 level of significance, is there a significant difference between the treatments?...
After randomly assigning subjects to treatments in a randomized comparative experiment, we can compare the treatment groups to see how well the randomization worked. We hope to find no significant differences among the groups. A study of how to provide premature infants with a substance essential to their development assigned infants at random to receive one of four types of supplement, called PBM, NLCP, PL-LCP, and TG- LCP. We are interested in whether the randomization results in equal proportions of...
An experiment randomly assigned 263 adults to watch one of 3 TV programs. One group watched a violent program, the second watched a program with sexual content and the last group watched a neutral program. After viewing the program each participant was scored on their recall of the brand names in the commerical messages. The researchers compared the mean recall scores of the three viewing groups with an analysis of variance for a completely randomized design. Complete parts a through...
An experiment had to investigate the effect of two treatments on the formation of tartar in dogs. In addition to the two treatment groups, there was also a control group. The experiment included 26 dogs randomized to one of the three treatment groups: 1. P207 (addition of pyrophosphate to feed) 2. HMP (addition of sodium hexametaphosphate to feed) 3. Control (standard feed) After a period of 4 weeks, the tartar on each dog should be considered as an index, wherein...