A senator from a state with several semiconductor factories argues that the United States should threaten to impose tariff on Chinese semiconductors in order to induce the Chinese to remove its tariff on American cars. Which of the following justifications is the senator using to argue for the trade restriction on semiconductors?
Unfair-competition argument
Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument
National-security argument
Jobs argument
Infant-industry argument
Here, the senator is using the protectionism threat to strike a better deal for other market i.e. the cars.
The answer is "B", using protection as a bargaining chip.
The answer is Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument
Policymakers claim that a threat of trade restrictions can help remove trade restrictions already imposed by the foreign governments.
A senator from a state with several semiconductor factories argues that the United States should threaten...
match the argument with the response suggested by economi Match the argument with the response suggested by economists. The jobs argument: Trade should be restricted A Trade restriction causes domestic prices to rise. The cost because it destroys jobs in industries that compete with imports to consumers exceeds the lost earnings of workers who lose their jobs. It would be cheaper to pay the workers The dumping argument When a producer sells a retaliation from trading partners will shrink employment...
Paragraph One- Introduce your primary source "Chapter" (Economics of Public Issues, Miller et.al, 2014) claims....introduce the main point of the chapter and explain: Why should we care? How will this topic, issue, problem affect us? Or more to the point, who will benefit from knowing more about this issue, situation, problem. Why is this an important topic, issue, or problem? Paragraph Two Introduce the main points of your research. Make sure you give credit to at least two other sources....