Discuss the economic reasons for the merger movement that characterized the late 19th century. Give an assessment of the validity of these reasons.
Answer:
The economic reasons for the merger movement that characterized the late 19th century.
Merger movements:
One outstanding characteristic of mergers in the United States is the highly episodic nature of their occurrence.
In three periods—1898 through 1902, 1926 through 1930, and 1957 through 1961—industrial mergers occurred on so extensive a scale that they are best described as waves or movements.
This tendency of a fundamental form of enterprise expansion to show vast and widely separated peaks of activity has probably interested students more than the examination of individual mergers.
Economic reasons:
(1) The first recorded merger movement of major proportions occurred as the United States entered the twentieth century, its peak years being 1898 through 1902.
explanation:
For a number of industries it represented the formal consolidation of companies that had already achieved a certain degree of policy coordination through agreements to avoid active competition, agreements that had shown distressing tendencies to break down.
For a few important companies it represented merely a change in legal form, from trust to holding company, of an earlier merger.
Most importantly, however, it involved the consolidation of companies in a large number of previously dispersed industries into single companies in which control was tightly centralized.
It transformed many industries formerly characterized by many small and medium-size firms into those in which one or a few large corporations occupied dominant positions.
During the first merger wave such industrial giants as U.S. Steel, American Tobacco, International Harvester, DuPont, Anaconda Copper, Corn Products, American Smelting and Refining,
Otis Elevator, Allis-Chalmers, and American Sugar Refining were created.
(2) The second large movement took place in the last half of the 1920s, its peak years being 1926 through 1930. To some degree it represented consolidation in the important new industries that had appeared since the first merger wave.
It also reflected attempts in some industries to restore the levels of concentration achieved three decades earlier by firms whose leading positions had been eroded in the meantime.
Among the prominent companies created by merger in this period were National Steel, National Dairy Products, United Aircraft, Owens-Illinois, and Caterpillar Tractor.
(3)The third large movement was probably underway in the early 1960s. There was a short merger revival immediately following World War II, which was confined mainly to the two years 1946 and 1947.
However, merger activity did not return to sustained high levels until the mid-1950s.
The pattern of recent mergers has been more varied, with product diversification and tax minimization playing a more prominent role than in the earlier movements (Butters et al. 1951).
Conclusion:
The current revival of merger activity, while large, is not as large as the earlier merger movements.
In the five turn-of-the-century years, 1898 through 1902, at least 2,700 firms disappeared into the manufacturing and mining mergers reported in the financial press—and reporting was not as comprehensive as it has since become.
In the peak years of the late 1920s, 1926 through 1930, mergers claimed 4,800 firms.
By contrast, in the five years 1957 through 1961 there were about 2,900 disappearances.
Since the number as well as the size of industrial firms has grown considerably in the past six decades, the most recent levels of merger activity are relatively lower than suggested by the absolute comparisons.
Discuss the economic reasons for the merger movement that characterized the late 19th century. Give an...
what were the social political and economic causes and impacts of the late 19th century urban growth
Need 2 -3 paragraph Considering the aesthetics of the late 19th century, how, in your opinion, did 19th century artists influence Modernism in the 20th century? Use at least one example of 19th century art in your response as a basis for your analysis.
Europe in the 19th century was not dominated by: a. the scientific quest b. economic collectivism c.concert of europe d. Industrial revolution
How do you define corrupt power? Lord Acton, a British historian of the late 19th century, said that “power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely,” suggesting that a person’s sense of morality lessens as his or her power increases. Discuss this idea. Do you agree that power corrupts? Can you provide an example? Considering this idea, is it ethical for leaders to try to increase their power?
Discuss the pros and cons of 19th century capitalism. For example, consider: • The rise of big companies and corporations • The increased importance of finance capital • The problems of monopoly
Discuss the differences between the 19th century conservative, liberal and radical views of women’s education
give two different reasons why Hayek expected an economic collapse in every socialist country. Each reason (A and B) must use economic fundamentals to demonstrate the problems expected by Hayek. (note: It is not sufficient simply to state that in the late 20th century many socialist countries collapsed, proving Hayek’s long term forecast. You must give two of Hayek’s reasons.)
give two different reasons why Hayek expected an economic collapse in every socialist country. Each reason (A and B) must use economic fundamentals to demonstrate the problems expected by Hayek. (note: It is not sufficient simply to state that in the late 20th century many socialist countries collapsed, proving Hayek’s long term forecast. You must give two of Hayek’s reasons.)
In late 19th-century technological development increased relative demand for unskilled workers in most European countries compared with the demand for skilled workers, meanwhile, the immigration to American countries (mainly to the USA but also to Latin America and Canada) decreased the relative supply of unskilled labor force in Europe. How would these two trends affect the inequality of skilled and unskilled workers?
Question 5 (1 point) ✓ Saved Back in the late 19th century, the Carnegie Steel company controlled not only the mills where the steel was manufactured, but also the mines where the iron ore was extracted, the coal mines that supplied the coal, the ships that transported the iron ore and the railroads that transported the coal to the factory. Through several ______ mergers the steel company gained control of the various resources it needed to product steel. O 1)...