Which party- Coors or the federal government - won the case & why?
Coors won the case. The government was not able to prove a strong case even though they possessed a very strong interest in preventing a so called “strength war” between alcohol companies. The government also could not prove that the speech restriction directly affected the main interest that the government had in the matter.
A federal statute and related regulations prohibited producers of beer from listing, on a product label, the alcohol content of the beer in the container on which the label appeared. The regulation existed because the U.S. government believed that if alcohol content could be disclosed on labels, certain producers of beer might begin marketing their brand as having a higher alcohol content than competing beers. The government was concerned that “strength wars” among producers could then develop, that consumers would...
Under federal copyright law, a party is entitled to “minimum” damages . however this is not the case in patent law . why the difference. please give a clear explainantion .
In the recent 2019 Australian Federal Election, the Coalition Party was elected to reform government for the next three years. This result came as somewhat of a surprise to many political experts, because public polling for many months indicated that the Labor Party was quite likely to win instead. It follows that something has gone wrong with the polling. In fact, some experts are referring to this event as the “Great Australian Polling Failure of 2019”. Possible explanations include: i)...
Which of the following statements explains why borrowing from the public by the federal government to pay for it's debt is not inflationary? A. Borrowing from the public actually offsets the increase in government spending by increasing household and or business spending. B. Borrowing from the public actually offsets the increase in household spending by reducing business spending. C. Borrowing from the public actually offsets the increase in business spending by reducing household spending. D. Borrowing from the public actually...
In a paragraph or two please explain why Federal Government seeks to establish standards for employee work hours and compensation? Should the Federal Government (or state governments) regulate this area? Why or why not.
Discuss the different employee protections set forth by the federal government. Has the federal government put too many restrictions and “protections” on the employer and employee? Why/why not?
Discuss the different employee protections set forth by the federal government. Has the federal government put too many restrictions and “protections” on the employer and employee? Why/why not?
Should the federal government have executed Timothy McVeigh and Juan Raul Garza? Why or why not?
1. What happens when a secured party and an unsecured party claim security interests in the same collateral? Is that fair? Why or why not? 2. How might a notice of default and foreclosure actually benefit a debtor who is behind on payments? 3. Should the federal government regulate the advertising of real property and mortgages on the Internet to protect consumers from potential fraud? Why or why not? If so, what kind of regulations would be appropriate, and how...
Why should federal and state government agencies track employment and unemployment data? Why should they be concerned about the under-employed and discouraged workers?