Question

In NFIB v. Sebelius, the United States Supreme Court upheld Obamacare as constitutional exercise of the...

In NFIB v. Sebelius, the United States Supreme Court upheld Obamacare as constitutional exercise of the power of Congress to make law. In a lengthy dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia laid out the case for why the Court got it wrong. Who was right: Roberts or Scalia? Why? Explain.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

I think Robert was right in decision on affordable care acts as healthcare is basic necessities for people and a law passed by Congress should only be judicially reviewed if there is violation of constitutional provision . However , Scalia opposition is more based on technical grounds that law mentions state only while judgement mentions exchange by state. Moreover issue over subsidising 87% population has also been opposed. But these are natter to be enquired by executives and not prerogative of judiciary.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In NFIB v. Sebelius, the United States Supreme Court upheld Obamacare as constitutional exercise of the...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT