Question

Since the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota v. Wayfair, States may pass legislation...

Since the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota v. Wayfair, States may pass legislation which requires business to collect Sales Tax from customers even though no Sales Tax Nexus would otherwise exisit.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Note : Since it is not clear in the question as to what is asked and since after reading the question it seems like the question either asks us to comment on the statement or state whether it true or false, we have assumed that to be the question and answered accordingly :

Yes, the statement is true.

Supreme court ruling in South Dakota v Wayfair provides that states may charge tax on purchases made from out-of-state sellers, even if the seller does not have a physical presence in the taxing state. The supreme court issued its decision on June 21, 2018 stating that the physical presence rule decided from Quill Corp. v. North Dakota was "unsound and incorrect" in the current age of Internet services. Due to the Supreme court ruling of Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, sales via electronic channels, particularly purchases from Internet vendors, had grown rapidly and the US Govt. has lost billions of tax due to the same.

Now due to the fact that states may impose taxes despite non-applicability of state nexus rules, states have begun implementing thresholds/limits on the basis of factors such as number of transactions and amount generated. Despite there being a lot of dissenting opinions, this ruling has gained a lot of popularity and support in the US.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Since the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota v. Wayfair, States may pass legislation...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., the Supreme Court: A. Reaffirmed the “physical presence” requirement and...

    In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., the Supreme Court: A. Reaffirmed the “physical presence” requirement and held that the State’s efforts to require defendants to collect sales tax violated Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. B. Held that because the defendants had no employees or real property in the State, they could not be required to collect sales tax consistent with the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. C. Overruled prior precedent and held that the defendants were subject to...

  • 1. The Connecticut state Supreme Court ruled that the United States Constitution requires teachers to warn...

    1. The Connecticut state Supreme Court ruled that the United States Constitution requires teachers to warn students of their right not to say anything before they can be questioned about cheating. This decision is the complete opposite of a decision reached by the Federal Court of Appeals for the circuit which includes Connecticut. Must the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals withdraw its ruling? Please explain. 2. Jack Thomas, who live in Minnesota, and Sandy Silver, who live in Oklahoma, each...

  • Case analysis: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain 542 U.S. 692 (2004) United States Supreme Court please list four...

    Case analysis: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain 542 U.S. 692 (2004) United States Supreme Court please list four alternative courses of action which would have helped the client not get into the "problem. with evaluation.

  • In Direct Sales Co. v. United States,[i] discussed in the Lauria case, the conviction of a...

    In Direct Sales Co. v. United States,[i] discussed in the Lauria case, the conviction of a wholesale drug company for conspiracy to violate the narcotic laws by selling large quantities of drugs to a physician who was supplying addicts was upheld by the Supreme Court. The Lauria court distinguished Direct Sales case from United States v. Falcone,[ii] in which the sellers of large quantities of sugar, yeast, and cans were absolved from participation in a moonshining conspiracy. What do you...

  • Refer to the LawNow article, "The Rule of Law: Two Notable Supreme Court Decisions to Celebrate"...

    Refer to the LawNow article, "The Rule of Law: Two Notable Supreme Court Decisions to Celebrate" written by Rob Normey. According to the article, which of the following statements is FALSE? Select one: a. The concept of the rule of law and the need to strictly comply with it is often presented with a flourish in legal and political debates. b. The article celebrated the Mackeigan v. Hickman (1989) and R. v Westendorp cases c. One essential aspect of the...

  • Case: Forestal Guarani S.A. v. Daros International, Inc. 613 F.3d 395 United States Court of Appeals...

    Case: Forestal Guarani S.A. v. Daros International, Inc. 613 F.3d 395 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 2010 Facts: Forestal Guarani S.A., in Argentina, entered into an oral agreement to sell wooden finger-joints to Daros International, Inc. in New Jersey.[1] Forestal sent Daros the products but Daros declined to pay the full amount. When Forestal sued Daros in the U.S. for breach of contract, Daros denied owing anything because, under New Jersey sales law, the contract would...

  • REGER DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. NATIONAL CITY BANK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH CIRCUIT 592 F.3d...

    REGER DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. NATIONAL CITY BANK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH CIRCUIT 592 F.3d 759 (2010) FACTS: Reger Development borrowed money from National City Bank, using a revolving line of credit supported by a promissory note. At the point that National City discussed the possibility of calling the note, Reger Development sued the bank for breach of contract and fraud. The district court granted National City’s motion to dismiss Reger’s complaint. Reger had met with the bank prior...

  • a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who...

    a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Couple” . Briefly summarize the case. b] Use as many specific concepts and contents from this course to develop your argument either in favor or against that Supreme Court ruling. c] Can you identify any direct and/or indirect violence associated with this conflict? Article: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who had refused to...

  • Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 507 U.S. 604 (1993) The Supreme Court resolved a split among...

    Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 507 U.S. 604 (1993) The Supreme Court resolved a split among the circuits in the following case, where it confronted the question of whether an employer violates the ADEA where factors other than age motivate the adverse employment decision. The Hazens hired Walter Biggins in 1977 and fired him in 1986 when he was 62 years old. Biggins sued, alleging a violation of the ADEA. The Hazens claimed instead that they terminated him because he...

  • Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are...

    Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are the facts of this case? What is the issue? 2. In what court was it decided, and how did it get to that court? 3. What did the court below decide, and why? What did this court decide, and why? 4. What does it mean to be "affected with the public interest"? 5. What is the significance of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S....

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT