This Grammar is left recursive(the leftmost veriable in RHS is same as its LHS veriable)
Eg: <expression> = <expression> + <term>
So the expression tree also left assosiative.
Read the leaf nodes in the tree from left to right.
a) 4*6 - 6/4 - 2^3
b) 4*6 - (6/4 - 2^3)
c) 3^-2 - 3*2 + 3/2
d) 3^2*5
e) ((3^2))
1. Consider the following BNF definition of arithmetic expressions: <expression> <expression>+ <term> | <expression>-<term> <term> <term>...
3. Consider the following BNF for arithmetic expressions: <expression> ::= <term> <term>+ <expression> | <term> - <expression> <term> ::= <factor> | <factor> * <term> | <factor> I <term> <factor> ::= <constant> (<expression>) <constant ::= 0|1|2|3|4|5|6789 a) Show the expression tree of the following expression: 8/7*5/6-6/4/2-7*(5+2). b) Give the value of this expression. c) Same question as (a), if the BNF were <expression> ::= <term> | <expression>+ <term> | <expression> - <term> <term> ::= <factor> | <term>*<factor> | <term> / <factor>...
You are given the following context free grammar in BNF format. 1 <expression> ::= <term> | <expression> "+" <term> 2 <term> ::= <factor> | <term> "*" <factor> 3 <factor> ::= <constant> | <variable> | "(" <expression> ")" 4 <variable> ::= "x" | "y" | "z" 5 <constant> ::= <digit> | <digit> <constant> 6 <digit> ::= "0" | "1" | "2" | "3" | "4" | "5" | "6" | "7" | "8" | "9" a) Show how the expression 4...
Consider the following BNF grammar that we saw in class: EXP ::= EXP + TERM | EXP - TERM | TERM TERM ::= TERM * FACTOR | TERM / FACTOR | FACTOR FACTOR ::= ( EXP ) | DIGIT DIGIT ::= 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 (a) Translate into EBNF. (b) Draw syntax diagrams. (c) What are the two requirements on a grammar for a predictive parser to be able to...
EVALUATING GENERAL INFIX EXPRESSIONS INTRODUCTION The notation in which we usually write arithmetic expressions is called infix notation; in it, operators are written between their operands: X + Y. Such expressions can be ambiguous; do we add or multiply first in the expression 5 + 3 * 2? Parentheses and rules of precedence and association clarify such ambiguities: multiplication and division take precedence over addition and subtraction, and operators associate from left to right. This project implements and exercises a stack-based algorithm that evaluates...
Question 9 (10 points) Consider the following EBNF grammar for a "Calculator Language": <calculation> <expr> = <expr> > <term> (+1-) <expr> <term <term> <factor> (* ) <term> <factor> <factor> > (<expr>) value> <value> → [<sign> ] <unsigned [. <unsigned> ] <unsigned> <digit> { <digit> } <digit → 011121314151617189 <sign → + - which of the following sentences is in the language generated by this grammar? Whx.2 a. 3/+2.5 = b. 5- *3/4= c. (3/-2) + 3 = d. 5++3 =
Question 9 (10 points) Consider the following EBNF grammar for a “Calculator Language": <calculation> → <expr>= <expr> <term> (+1-) <expr> <term> <term> <factor> (* ) <term> <factor> <factor> → (<expr>) <value> <value> → [<sign> ] <unsigned> [. <unsigned> ] <unsigned> <digit> { <digit> } <digit> → 01|2|3|4|567| 8 | 9 <sign> → +|- which of the following sentences is in the language generated by this grammar ? Why? a. 3/+2.5 = b. 5-*3/4= c. (3/-2) + 3 = d. 5...
Consider the following BNF grammar: S ::= A x | B y A ::= B y | C w B ::= x | B w C ::= y Which of the following regular expressions describes the same set of strings as the grammar? 1. xwxy + xww∗y + ywx 2. xwx + xww∗y + yw 3. xw∗y + xwxyx + ywx 4. xwy + xw∗xyx + ywx 5. xw∗y + xw∗yx + ywx 6. none of the above 7. all...
Question 1 Consider the following BNF grammar: Not complete Marked out of 3.00 p Flag question <letter> ::= "a" | "b" | "C" | "d" | "e" | "F" | "g" | "h" | "1" ";" | "K" | "1" | "m" | "n" | "0" | "p" | "q" | "r" | "S" | "t" || "u" | "V" | "W" | "x" | "y" | "z" <digit> ::= "O" | "1" | "2" | "3" | "4" |...
1.a Consider the following Grammar, <assign> à <id> = <expr> <id> à A | B |C <expr> à < expr> + <expr> | <expr> * <expr> | ( <expr> ) | <id> Derive the following statement using leftmost derivation. A = A * (B*(C+ A)) b. 2 a}. Consider the following grammar that expresses parenthesized expressions of digits, including both addition and multiplication. <expr> := <expr> + <expr> | <expr> * <expr> | (expr>) | <digit> <digit> := 0 | 1 | 2 |...
3. Consider the following grammar: expr term term tail term-tail-) add-op term term-ail 1 ε term → factor factor-tail factor. tain ε factor (expr) id literal add-op → +1 Draw a syntax tree for parsing each of cdf + (a25 + 84), (a25 + 84)*cdf, 84*cdf+ a25, a25+84 cdf a25*84*cdf. Note that a25 and cdf are identifiers and 84 is a literal You are not asked to do the tedious parsing process with stack snapshots. Instead you only need to...