pop 1 | pop 2 | |||
sample mean x = | 65.40 | 59.90 | ||
std deviation σ= | 1.400 | 1.000 | ||
sample size n= | 30 | 39 | ||
std error σx1-x2=√(σ21/n1+σ22/n2) = | 0.302 | |||
test stat z =(x1-x2-Δo)/σx1-x2 = | 1.66 | |||
p value : = | 0.0485 | (from excel:1*normsdist(-1.66) |
fail to reject Ho ; the data does not suggest........
b)
Hypothesized mean difference Δo = | 5 | ||
true mean difference Δ = | 6 | ||
first sample standard deviation =σ1 = | 1.400 | ||
second sample std deviation =σ2= | 1.000 | ||
first sample size =n1 = | 30.000 | ||
second sample size =n2 = | 39.000 | ||
standard error=(√(σ12/n1+σ12/n1))= | 0.3016 | ||
for 0.001 level and right tail critival Zα= | 3.090 | ||
rejecf Ho if x>= Δo +Zα*σx or x>= | 5.932 | ||
P(Type II error) =P(Xbar<5.932| Δ=6)=P(Z<(5.932-6)/0.302)=P(Z<-0.23)=0.4090 |
question b An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging...
An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 16 Ni maraging steel with commercial purity steel of the same type Form 30 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 65.4 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n - 39 specimens of commercial steel y = 59.9. Because the high-punity to is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial purity steel by more than...
An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type. For m = 34 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 64.2 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 39 specimens of commercial steel y = 58.5. Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by more than...
An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type. For m = 32 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 64.3 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 37 specimens of commercial steel y = 58.8. Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by more than...
An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type. For m = 31 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 65.3 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 38 specimens of commercial steel y = 59.5. Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by more than...
An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type. For m = 30 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 65.5 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 39 specimens of commercial steel y = 59.9. Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by more than...
An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type. Form 34 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 63.1 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 39 specimens of commercial steel y = 57.3. Because the high- purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by more than 5....
An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial purity steel of the same type. For m = 34 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 63.1 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 39 specimens of commercial steel y = 57.3. Because the high- purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by...
An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial purity steel of the same type. For m = 34 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 63.1 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 39 specimens of commercial steel y = 57.3. Because the high- purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by...
Question 3 4 pts An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type. For n 32 specimens, the simple average toughness was 65.6 for the high-purity steel, whereas for N2 = 38 specimens of commercial steel = 59.8. Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by more...
Will give instant thumbs up, please show some work and equations if done in excel. An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type. For m = 33 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 64.1 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 38 specimens of commercial steel y = 58.6. Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can...