Question

A study comparing smokers to non-smokers history as a risk factor for Parkinson’s Disease reports an...

A study comparing smokers to non-smokers history as a risk factor for Parkinson’s Disease reports an incidence rate ratio of 0.3 comparing smokers to non-smokers.

1. What is the study design?

2. If the association is real, do these findings indicate an increase or decrease in risk for Parkinson’s disease?

3. A case-control study comparing Alzheimer’s cases to controls reported cases were less likely to have reported past smoking. Then, what kind of bias may explain these results?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

1)          Current or past tobacco smokers are at lower risk of developing Parkinson's disease that non-smokers a long term study of doctors reports. How smoking might person against Parkinson's however remains poorly understood. The many known health risks of tobacco smoking also far exceed "any protective effect", its researchers caution.

               The study "Tobacco smoking and the risk of Parkinson's on disease a 65 year follow up of 30,000 male British doctors," was published in the journal Neurology. Smoking is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease, it appears to exert a protective effect. Previous studies have suggested that Parkinson's incident is inversely associated to smoking, with one study reporting that smoking was associated with 60% lower risk for Parkinson's.  

               But the link between smoking and Parkinson's incident is not well understood as data on smoking habits are usually collected after disease and length of follow up is also limited making conclusions difficult. Researchers at the University of Oxford followed male doctors over 65 years to investigate the risk of Parkinson's disease associated with smoking habits the amount of smoked and the duration of effects among ex-smokers.

2)         The analysis included 29,737 doctors all members of the British Medical Association. Data on smoking habits were collected in seven self-completed questions from 1951 to 1998. Participants were asked to classify themselves as current tobacco smokers, ex-smokers, or those who have never smoked, amount smoked daily, and type of tobacco

                  Researchers observed that the percentage of current smokers declined markedly over the study. At its start in 1951, about 67% of doctors age 65 to 69, were smokers. This number dropped to 8% by 1998, the last year of follow-up. The percentage of those classified as cigarette smokers also decreased from 63% in 1951 to 33% in 1998. Specific cause of death was monitored between 1951 and 2016, participants were followed on average for 35 years of 25,379 deaths registered from 1961 to 2016, the first 10 years of follow-up were excluded, 283 were attributed to Parkinson's disease.

                 The crude death rate from Parkinson's was lower for current smokers , 30 per 100,000 person years, compared to non-smokers 46 per 100,000 person years. The crude death rate is the total number of deaths of residents in a specified geographic areas, divided by the total population for the same area. The next researchers modeled how smoking habits were associated to Parkinson's risk at the start-up and then periodically after each survey questionnaire. Results showed current tobacco smoking was inversely linked to Parkinson's risk at baseline and in the updated model.

                  At baseline 1951 doctors classified as current smokers had a 30% lesser risk of PD compared to those who never smoked. In the updated model, current smokers had a 40% lower disease risk compared with never smokers.Parkinson's risk was also found to depend on the daily amount smoked. A statistically significant inverse correlation in both baseline and updated models was seen between the amount of daily tobacco smoked and Parkinson's incidence.

3)           Doctors who quit smoking for 10 or more years had a 14% lower Parkinson's risk than those who had never smoked , those who had quit smoking for nine or few years had a 29% lower risk. The mechanisms underlying the observed inverse relationship are still not fully understood. Some argue that nicotine may have neuro - protective properties by stimulating the release of dopamine, the brain chemical lacking in Parkinson's patients, but other tobacco compounds may also play a role

                The researchers caution that "the adverse effects of smoking on risks of vascular and respiratory diseases, neoplasms and other noncommunicable diseases for which tobacco is the risk factor greatly exceed any protective effects of current tobacco smoking on the risk" of Parkinson's.

                  Doctors who died of causes other than Parkinson's did so at younger ages a mean of 77, than did those who died of Parkinson's the study noted.

                   The present report demonstrates a causally protective effects of current smoking on the risk of PD(Parkinson's disease), the researchers concluded adding that future studies to understand the mechanisms underlying such a protective effect may be worthwhile and may contribute to better etiologic understanding of PD.

              

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
A study comparing smokers to non-smokers history as a risk factor for Parkinson’s Disease reports an...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A study comparing smokers to non-smokers history as a risk factor for Parkinson's Disease reports an...

    A study comparing smokers to non-smokers history as a risk factor for Parkinson's Disease reports an incidence rate ratio of 0.3 comparing smokers to non-smokers. Explain your answers. 1) What is the study design? 2) If the association is real, do these findings indicate an increase or decrease in risk for Parkinson's disease? 3) A case-control study comparing Alzheimer's cases to controls reported cases were less likely to have reported past smoking. What kind of bias may explain these results?

  • The study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and non-smokers....

    The study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and non-smokers. The following table presents lung cancer mortality data and comparable cardiovascular disease mortality data. Table 2. Mortality rates (per 1,000 person-years), rate ratios, and excess deaths from lung cancer and cardiovascular disease by smoking status, Doll and Hill physician cohort study, Great Britain, 1951-1961. Mortality rate per 1,000 person-years Smokers Non-smokers All Rate ratio Excess deaths Attributable risk per 1,000 person-years smokers 1.23 2.19 percent among 1.30...

  • Multiple Question: 12. The relative risk for dying from lung cancer among smokers is 10. The...

    Multiple Question: 12. The relative risk for dying from lung cancer among smokers is 10. The relative risk for dying from heart disease among smokers is 1.5. The etiologic fraction for lung cancer due to smoking is 0.8 and the etiologic fraction for heart disease due to smoking is 0.2. Based on these finding, we can say that Smoking seems much more likely to be causally related to heart disease than to lung cancer. Smoking seems much more likely to...

  • An investigator conducted a case-control study in 1000 participants (500 cases and 500 controls) ...

    An investigator conducted a case-control study in 1000 participants (500 cases and 500 controls) to examine the association between childhood head trauma (exposure) and Parkinson’s disease(outcome). Information on head trauma was self-reported by study participants. Cases were able to correctly report exposure to head trauma 96% of the time, while controls correctly reported exposure to head trauma 80% of the time. Cases and controls correctly reported no exposure to head trauma 96% and 98% of the time, respectively. The truth(which...

  • In your opinion, which of the below three study design is best to assess the relationship...

    In your opinion, which of the below three study design is best to assess the relationship between smoking and CRC? Why? (6 sentences) No plagiarism please Cross Sectional Study 1. Verga Enterprises is conducting a study to assess the relationship between smoking and colorectal cancer (CRC). In the survey that was conducted, 20 out of 100 non-smokers had CRC, while 40 out of 60 smokers had CRC. (a) What makes this a Cross Sectional study design? This particular case is...

  • In a study to assess the relationship between smoking and CRC in men, Verga Enterprises conducts...

    In a study to assess the relationship between smoking and CRC in men, Verga Enterprises conducts a study wherein 100 smokers and 100 non-smokers were followed for 10 years (all the men were 60 at the start of the study). Ten men who were smokers developed CRC whereas 5 non-smokers developed disease. (a) What makes this a Case Control study design? (b) Complete the 2x2 table. (c) What is the risk of developing CRC among smokers? (d) What is the...

  • 5. Smoking and duodenal ulcers. The Health Professionals Follow-up Study is a prospective study of heart...

    5. Smoking and duodenal ulcers. The Health Professionals Follow-up Study is a prospective study of heart disease and cancer among more than 50,000 health professionals in the United States who were 40–75 years of age in 1986. Every two years questionnaires are sent to these individuals, and newly diagnosed cases of various diseases reported. The following data are constructed from the surveys returned in the 1993 mailing. The investigators in this study were interested in the relationship between smoking status...

  • The Black Women's Health Study, a study of risk factors for coronary heart disease in African...

    The Black Women's Health Study, a study of risk factors for coronary heart disease in African American women, consisted of 352 women who reported having had a heart attack (cases), who were matched on age with 1760 controls (Am J Epi 1999; 150:904-909). The following data summarize some of the findings. History of Heart Attack in a Parent Case Control Total No 169 1082 1251 Yes: at age 50+ 91 329 420 Yes: before age 50 53 106 159 Total...

  • The cohort study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and nqnsmokers. The following...

    The cohort study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and nqnsmokers. The following table presents lung cancer mortanty data an cardiovascular disease mortality data. ortality rates (per 1,000 person-years), rate ratios, and excess deaths from lung cancer an cardiovascular disease by smoking status, Doll and Hill physician cohort study, Great Britain, 1951-1961 Attributable risk percent among Mortality rate per 1000 person-years Non-smokers 0.07 7.32 Excess deaths per 1,000 Rate ratio ponears mokers 1.3 Lung cancer 1.37 0.99...

  • Lung Cancer & Smoking Case Study A causal relationship between cigarette smoking and lung cancer was...

    Lung Cancer & Smoking Case Study A causal relationship between cigarette smoking and lung cancer was first suspected in the 1920s on the basis of clinical observations. To test this apparent association, numerous epidemiologic studies were undertaken between 1930 and 1960. Two studies were conducted by Richard Doll and Austin Bradford Hill in Great Britain The first was a case-control study begun in 1947 comparing the smoking habits of lung cancer patients with the smoking habits of other patients. The...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT