Question

1. We argued in the text that Rawls's Difference Principle asserts that it is only just to have an unequal distribution of wealth if all persons benefit from that allocation, relative to the situation of an equal distribution. But we also argued that the total level of utility attainable might depend on the distribution of wealth, as utility could be higher in an unequal position if incentive effects enhance productive efficiency. Discuss the implications of these comments for a morally just distribution of resources within and between countries.

Answer 1

Implications of Rawl's difference principles for morally distribution of resources are:
1) equality in Liberty principles has the priority.
2) equal opportunity to all
3) distribution in a manner in which country requires the most.
4)it also implies on the distribution according to the income and also wealth of the individual of the country.
5) distribution of resources on the basis of social status, position, responsibility,and power.
6) social inequalities along with economical inequalities of different countries are taken into consideration.
7) equality is maintained and proportionately distributed
8)human rights are also focused while distributing resources
9) landscape which are dominated historically also posses an influence.
10)poor native people along with those families which are suffering from illness or accidents are compensated.
11) every country and individual differentiated by religion, colour,income get equal distribution of resources.