Please don't hesitate to give a "thumbs up" for the answer in case the answer has helped you
a.
P(respondants where age 31-55 or preferred to get political news via Internat sources)
= P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B)
= (81/251) + (109/251) - (29/251)
= 0.6414
Answer: 0.6414
b. P(given pre is Int.sources, were aged 56 and over)
= 33/70
= .4714
Answer: 0.4714
c.
Concept: Events are independent only if P(A and B)= P(A)*P(B)
Let A be event of a person being in the age group of 18-30
Let B be event of a person who prefers via tele
So, P(A and B) = 5/251 = 0.0199
P(A) = 75/251
P(B) = 72/251
P(A)*P(B) = 75*72/251^2 = 0.0857
So, P(A and B) is not equal to P(A)*P(B)
Answer: Hence, these 2 events ARE NOT INDEPENDENT
31 - 55 25 over 33 70 1. A polling organization talks to several people concerning...
A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...