Question

0 In spite of being forced, a forced convection is not as efficient as free convection in removing heat from a vertical hot

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Problems iii, vii, ix and x are solved below.

iii) Birds take advantage of natural convection while soaring.

  • TRUE
  • ​​​​​​​The given statement is true. The birds always uses convection currents as the additional advantage while soaring to save their energy for flying high.
  • Instead of using their wings to flap by using their energy, this convection currents helps birds to fly for much more time without flap at such heights.
  • Hence, this makes some advantage for birds.

vii) Free convection involves a higher value of convection heat transfer coefficient h compared to a forced convection:

  • FALSE
  • ​​​​​​Heat transfer coeffficient is mainly depends on flow velocity, properties of fluid, type of flow.
  • Hence, in natural convection, there not be much flow velocity. But, in forced convection, there is large flow velocity.
  • This helps in inducing more heat transfer coeffficient values.
  • Hence, heat transfer coeffficient for forced convection is more than that of free convection.
  • But the given statement says, h is more for free convection. Hence, the given statement is wrong.

ix) If you observe the Grashof number, Gr_{L}=\frac{g\beta (T_{s} - T_{\infty})L^{2} }{v^{2}} carefully, it is ratio of buoyancy force and viscous force.

  • TRUE
  • We know that, Grashof number is a ratio of buoyancy force to viscous force which represents Gr_{L}=\frac{g\beta (T_{s} - T_{\infty})L^{2} }{v^{2}} , where g= acceleration due to gravity, \beta = coeffficient of thermal expansion, T_{s} = surface temperature, T_{\infty} = outside fluid temperature, L= characteristic length, v = kinematic viscosity.
  • Hence, the given statement is true.

x) What Grashof number is to free convection flow, Reynolds number is to forced convection flow.

  • TRUE
  • ​​​​​​​We know that, function of Grashof number and Reynolds number are same. Because both are used to find the type of flow.
  • Only difference is that, Reynolds number is used in case of forced convection and Grashof number is used in case of free convection.
  • Hence, the given statement is true.

​​​​​​

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
0 In spite of being forced', a forced convection is not as efficient as free convection...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • (0) In spite of being 'forced, a forced convection is not as efficient as free convection...

    (0) In spite of being 'forced, a forced convection is not as efficient as free convection in removing heat from a vertical hot plate. True / False (ii) Computer components are designed such that the are cooled due to natural convection. This cooling will be even more effective if the computer is on the space station. True / False (iii) Birds take advantage of natural convection while soaring. True / False (iv) A fictitious planet similar to earth has an...

  • Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming...

    Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...

  • CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a...

    CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT