null hypothesis: Ho: ρ'= | 0 | |
Alternate Hypothesis: Ha: ρ≠ | 0 |
0.01 level,two tail test and n-2= 10 df, critical t=3.169 | (from excel:tinv(0.01,10) | ||
Decision rule: reject Ho if absolute value of test statistic |t|>3.1693 | |||
0.01 level,two tail test and n-2= 10 df, critical r=0.708 | |||
correlation r='Sxy/(√Sxx*Syy) = | -0.290 | ||
test stat t= | r*(√(n-2)/(1-r2))= | -0.958 | |
P value = | 0.3607 | (from excel:tdist(0.9579,10,2) |
since test statistic does not falls in rejection region we fail to reject null hypothesis |
we do not have sufficient evidence at 0.01 level to conclude that there is a significant correlation between mass and altitude,
5. The following observations were made about the leaf hopper insect's body mass versus the altitude...
The following observations were made about the leaf hopper insect’s body mass versus the altitude at which it was caught in balloon mounted nets. Carry out a model utility test at a significance level of 1.00%. Mass x 10.5 12.6 9.1 11.0 13.0 9.0 16.0 13.0 12.3 12.0 9.0 14.2 Altitude y 1000 900 1200 1000 1100 1300 1200 900 800 1200 1000 800