Question

In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 881...

In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years

881

people were selected for grand jury duty and

41​%

of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty,

80.2​%

were of this ethnicity. Use a

0.01

significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null​ hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the​ P-value method and the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution.

Which of the following is the hypothesis test to be​ conducted?

A.

H0: p=0.802

H1: p<0.802

Your answer is correct.

B.

H0: p=0.802

H1: p>0.802

C.

H0: p<0.802

H1: p=0.802

D.

H0: p=0.802

H1: p≠0.802

E.

H0: p>0.802

H1: p=0.802

F.

H0: p≠0.802

H1: p=0.802

What is the test​ statistic?

z=negative 29.13−29.13

​(Round to two decimal places as​ needed.)

What is the​ P-value?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

using excel>addin>phstat>one sample test

we have

.

Z Test of Hypothesis for the Proportion
Data
Null Hypothesis            p = 0.802
Level of Significance 0.05
Number of Items of Interest 361
Sample Size 881
Intermediate Calculations
Sample Proportion 0.41
Standard Error 0.0134
Z Test Statistic -29.1981
Two-Tail Test
Lower Critical Value -1.9600
Upper Critical Value 1.9600
p-Value 0.0000
Reject the null hypothesis
Z Test of Hypothesis for the Proportion
Data
Null Hypothesis            p = 0.802
Level of Significance 0.05
Number of Items of Interest 361
Sample Size 881
Intermediate Calculations
Sample Proportion 0.41
Standard Error 0.0134
Z Test Statistic -29.1981
Two-Tail Test
Lower Critical Value -2.5758
Upper Critical Value 2.5758
P value

0.0000

Reject the null hypothesis

the null and alternative hypothesis is

D.H0: p=0.802

H1: p≠0.802

z test stat = -29.20

p value= 0.000

there is sufficient evidence to support the claim the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 881...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 869...

    In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 869 people were selected for grand jury duty and 42​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 78.2​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion...

  • Z= ?? 8.2.31-T Question Help in a recent court case it was found that during a...

    Z= ?? 8.2.31-T Question Help in a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 865 people were selected for grand jury duty and 39% of them were from the same thinly Among the people eligible for grand jury duty, 79.9% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative...

  • In a recent court case was found that during a period of 11 years 162 people...

    In a recent court case was found that during a period of 11 years 162 people were selected for grand jay duty and 39% of them were from the same thicily Among the people for grand jury duty, 807% were of this ethnicity Use a 001 significance level to the aim at the selection process is based againstalowing cost on the grand Idently the rol hypothesis alternative hypothesis, les statistic P. valore, conclusion about the null hypothesis, and final conclusion...

  • In the case of Castaneda v. Partida, it was found that in a period of 11...

    In the case of Castaneda v. Partida, it was found that in a period of 11 years in Hidalgo County, Texas, 870 people were selected for grand jury duty and 339 of them were Americans of Mexican ancestry. Among the people eligible for grand jury duty, 79.1% were Americans of Mexicans ancestry. Use a 0.01 level of significance to test the claim that the selection process was biased against Americans of Mexican ancestry. (In other words, that the proportion of...

  • A recent broadcast of a television show had a 1010 share, meaning that among 60006000 monitored...

    A recent broadcast of a television show had a 1010 share, meaning that among 60006000 monitored households with TV sets in use, 1010 % of them were tuned to this program. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim of an advertiser that among the households with TV sets in use, less than 1515 % were tuned into the program. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses...

  • Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

    Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...

  • Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

    Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...

  • When 3014 adults were surveyed in a​ poll, 79​% said that they use the Internet. Is...

    When 3014 adults were surveyed in a​ poll, 79​% said that they use the Internet. Is it okay for a newspaper reporter to write that ​"3/4 of all adults use the​ Internet"? Why or why​ not? Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null​ hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the​ P-value method. Use the normal distribution as an approximation of the binomial distribution. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Choose...

  • Trials in an experiment with a polygraph include 97 results that include 22 cases of wrong...

    Trials in an experiment with a polygraph include 97 results that include 22 cases of wrong results and 75 cases of correct results. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that such polygraph results are correct less than 80% of the time. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method. Use the normal distribution as an approximation of the binomial...

  • In a study of 807 randomly selected medical malpractice​ lawsuits, it was found that 497 of...

    In a study of 807 randomly selected medical malpractice​ lawsuits, it was found that 497 of them were dropped or dismissed. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed. Which of the following is the hypothesis test to be​ conducted? A. H0: p>0.5 H1: p=0.5 B. H0: p=0.5 H1: p<0.5 C. H0: p≠0.5 H1: p=0.5 D. H0: p=0.5 H1: p≠0.5 E. H0: p<0.5 H1: p=0.5 F. H0: p=0.5 H1: p>0.5...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT