Question

In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 869...

In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 869 people were selected for grand jury duty and 42​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 78.2​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null​ hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the​ P-value method and the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 869...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 881...

    In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 881 people were selected for grand jury duty and 41​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 80.2​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion...

  • Z= ?? 8.2.31-T Question Help in a recent court case it was found that during a...

    Z= ?? 8.2.31-T Question Help in a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 865 people were selected for grand jury duty and 39% of them were from the same thinly Among the people eligible for grand jury duty, 79.9% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative...

  • In a recent court case was found that during a period of 11 years 162 people...

    In a recent court case was found that during a period of 11 years 162 people were selected for grand jay duty and 39% of them were from the same thicily Among the people for grand jury duty, 807% were of this ethnicity Use a 001 significance level to the aim at the selection process is based againstalowing cost on the grand Idently the rol hypothesis alternative hypothesis, les statistic P. valore, conclusion about the null hypothesis, and final conclusion...

  • In the case of Castaneda v. Partida, it was found that in a period of 11...

    In the case of Castaneda v. Partida, it was found that in a period of 11 years in Hidalgo County, Texas, 870 people were selected for grand jury duty and 339 of them were Americans of Mexican ancestry. Among the people eligible for grand jury duty, 79.1% were Americans of Mexicans ancestry. Use a 0.01 level of significance to test the claim that the selection process was biased against Americans of Mexican ancestry. (In other words, that the proportion of...

  • 37. Bias in Jury Selection In the case of Casteneda v. Partida, it was found that...

    37. Bias in Jury Selection In the case of Casteneda v. Partida, it was found that during a period of 11 years in Hidalgo County, Texas, 870 people were selected for grand jury duty, and 39% of them were Mexican-Americans. Use the sample data to construct a 99% confidence interval estimate of the proportion of grand jury members who were Mexican-Americans. Given that among the people eligible for jury duty, 79.1% of them were Mexican-Americans, does it appear that the...

  • A recent broadcast of a television show had a 10 ​share, meaning that among 5000 monitored...

    A recent broadcast of a television show had a 10 ​share, meaning that among 5000 monitored households with TV sets in​ use, 10​% of them were tuned to this program. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim of an advertiser that among the households with TV sets in​ use, less than 15​% were tuned into the program. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null​ hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original...

  • In a recent? poll, 789 adults were asked to identify their favorite seat when they? fly,...

    In a recent? poll, 789 adults were asked to identify their favorite seat when they? fly, and 508 of them chose a window seat. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the majority of adults prefer window seats when they fly. Identify the null? hypothesis, alternative? hypothesis, test? statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null?hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the? P-value method and the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution....

  • In a recent​ poll, 780 adults were asked to identify their favorite seat when they​ fly,...

    In a recent​ poll, 780 adults were asked to identify their favorite seat when they​ fly, and 492 of them chose a window seat. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the majority of adults prefer window seats when they fly. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null​ hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the​ P-value method and the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial...

  • Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

    Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...

  • Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

    Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT