Question

Within the health information management industry, there is often great confusion as to who actually has ownership over an original copy of a medical record: the physician or the patient? The physician is creating the records; however, he or she is creating them based on the happenings of a patient, so the question remains...who actually own as the original medical record?

Answer 1

Most would figure the patient takes ownership; nonetheless, this isn't altogether the situation. The physical medical record really has a place with the doctor who made it and the office in which the record was made. The data accumulated inside the first medical record is possessed by the patient. This is the reason patients are permitted a copy of their medical record, yet not the first report. Each medicinal services office is legally necessary to keep up the first medical record of a patient that gets the consideration and must shield it from misfortune, harm, modification, and unapproved use. The first medical record is viewed as an authoritative report and may not be expelled from the office's premises without a court request.

In spite of the fact that the first medical record IS the property of the doctor's office who made it (as expressed over), the patient is permitted to "assess, survey and get their very own duplicate medical records and charging records" held by wellbeing plans and human services suppliers secured by the HIPAA Privacy Rule. A supplier can't deny a patient a duplicate of their medical records, regardless of whether the patient has not yet paid for the administrations delivered. That being stated, the human services supplier is permitted and may charge the patient an expense for duplicating and mailing their medical records. These expenses differ by state and are ordinarily following a resolution set up by that specific state's enactment.