4. S v R 1,2,3 Constructive Dilemma (CD)
This is the direct answer.
The reasoning is quite easy to follow.
As it is a direct result of Constructive Dilemma from the rules of inference.
Answer 1. RP 2. Q R 3. Q->P (Premise) (Premise) /..Q->P 1, 2, CA Construct deductions...
Example 1. RP 2. Q R 1:: Q = P. Answer 11. RP 2. Q R 3. Q->P (Premise) (Premise) /.. Q->P [1, 2, CA Construct deductions for each of the following arguments using Group I rules. (4) es 1. P 2. (R & S) v Q 3. NP "QI.. "(R & S) 1. P 2. "(R & S) VQ 3.`p NQ 4 5. (Premise) (Premise) (Premise)/A MR & S) If
Required information SIM = Simplification Example 1. RP 2. Q - R 7..QP Answer 1. RP 2. Q R 3. Q ->P (Premise) (Premise) 7.. Q->P [1, 2, CA Construct deductions for each of the following arguments using Group I rules. (3) 1. (Q v P) +R 2. P/.. R 1. (Q v P) +R 2. P 13R 14. (Premise) |(Premise) /:: R
Required information 3. Q NS 4. PNS 5. NS "R 16. PR (Premise)/: PR 1, 3, CA 2, CONTR 4, 5, CA Identify which Group I or Group II Rule was used in Deductions. (1) 1. NP (Premise) 2.( QR) & ( RQ) (Premise) 3. Rv P (Premise) /: Q 4. R 5. R Q 6. Q aces 11. P 2. ( QR) & (R+Q) 3. RVP 4. R 5 R + Q 6. Q (Premise) (Premise) (Premise).
N 3. Q+ "S 4.PNS 5. NS "R 6. PMR KPremise)/:P "R 1, 3, CA 2, CONTR 4, 5, CA mts Identify which Group I or Group II Rule was used in Deductions. (2) Ask Print 1. P - Q (Premise) 2. R - ("S v T) (Premise) 3. p R (Premise)/: ("Q & S) T 4.NQ NP 5. "Q R 6. "Q ("S v T) 7. "Q ( ST) 8. ("Q & S) T References (Premise) |(Premise) (Premise)/: ("Q...
Construct proofs to show that the following symbolic arguments are valid. G )) 1. (A V~B) → (FV ( R 2. A 3. F→L 4. ( RG) →T 5. (LVT) →S ::S 15. 1. PVQ 2.( QR) →S 3. R →P 4. ~P ..S
Complete the proof. [}proof{]; 1. AvB, premise; 2.A>(C&D), premise; 3.B>(~C&D),premisel:D>C Answer: efs in Three Jump to... ns Complete the proof. [}proof{l; 1. (A&B)>C, premise; 2.B,premisel:~AVC Answer: Complete the proof. [}proof{]; 1.A,premise; 2.Bvc, premise| : ~(A&B)>(A&C) Answer:
9. Prove the following argument, stating justification for each step below: Premise 1) p r Premise 2) Premise 3) 4) 5) 6)
determine whether the argument is balud usinf the eight rules
of standard deduction
Page 2) 1.-P → (Q v (R & S)) 2. P→Q 3. -Av Q 4-Q / ~RvS 3) 1, ~P → Q 4. S
Page 2) 1.-P → (Q v (R & S)) 2. P→Q 3. -Av Q 4-Q / ~RvS 3) 1, ~P → Q 4. S
Write the answers on the white sheet of paper.
Math for computing
1. If P and Q represent the following statements: P:1 is an odd integer Q:1<2 State whether each of the following is true or false: a)PAQ b) -PvQ 2. Construct a truth table for the following expression: PV(Q →P) 3. Write the converse, inverse and contrapositive of the following statements and express each of the following statements symbolically: "If today is Saturday, then I will go for a...
3. (Logic) Answer the following questions:
Construct the truth table for (p rightarrow r) (q rightarrow r) doubleheadarrow (p q) rightarrow r Is the following argument valid? (r s) (q s) s rightarrow (p r) rightarrow t) t rightarrow (s r) p rightarrow r