Try to perform the roof problem analysis for both cases, and then answer the questions.
1) For the pavement analysis, what is the correct decision?
Concrete
Asphalt
Don't repave the lot
Close the missile engineering office
2) For the pavement analysis, what is the annual worth of the concrete option?
$3,300
( $3,000 )
( $3,300 )
$3,000
3) For the NASA situation, what should NASA do?
Stop using the test stand
Hire Tom's Gauges
Do nothing
Hire HP Calibration Services
4) What is the annual worth of the calibration performed by HP?
( $31,000)
( $32,000)
( $32,500 )
( $31,500 )
`Solution -1
Lockheed Marthin should use the Concrete pavement in parking lot. Since in the Asphalt pavement bid and concrete pavement bid, there is a difference of only $ 10,000 in the bidding price and the concrete pavement provide guarantee of 25 years , 15 years more than Asphalt pavement. So it is benificial to choose Concrete pavement.
Solution -2
The annual worth of the concrete option is ($3,000) .
Solution -3
The NASA should given bid to the HP Calibation services , since they are providing services from the very long to NASA and their Bid is more worth as compared to the Tom Guages Bid. They are providing 12 years colibration stand service at $2,50,000. Which is more worth than Tom guages 3 years service at $1,00,000.
Solution -4
The annual worth of the HP Calibration service option is ($31,000) .
Try to perform the roof problem analysis for both cases, and then answer the questions. 1)...