I. For Molding Department
Beginning inventory - 10,000 units which is 40% complete [i.e. 100% material (since material is applied in the beginning) and 40% conversion cost] at a cost of $ 35,800 ($ 22,000 for material and $ 13,800 for conversion).
Computing ending inventory -
Ending inventory = Beginning inventory + Units started - Units transferred
= 10,000 + 25,000 - 30,000
= 5,000 units which is 80% complete as given in the question
Reconciliation of units
Beginning WIP + Units started = Units completed from beginning WIP + Units started and completed + Ending inventory
10,000 (given) + 25,000 (given) = 10,000 (since FIFO method) + 20,000 (total completed units is 30,000 out of which 10,000 are from beginning inventory) + 5,000 (as computed above)
35,000 units = 35,000 units
Material and conversion process incurred during the relevant period in equivalent units
Material |
Conversion cost |
|
Beginning inventory (10,000) |
Nil (0%) |
6,000 (60%) |
Started and completed (20,000) |
20,000 (100%) |
20,000 (100%) |
Ending inventory (5,000) |
5,000 (100%) |
4,000 (80%) |
Total |
25,000 |
30,000 |
Cost incurred during the period (in $) |
56,250 |
106,500 |
Cost per unit |
$ 2.25 (56,250/25,000) |
$ 3.55 (106,500/ 30,000) |
Hence, total cost per unit is $ 5.80 per unit ($2.25 + $3.55).
Computation of cost
Beginning inventory |
Started and completed |
Ending inventory |
|
Opening cost (A) |
35,800 (given) |
- |
- |
Material cost (B) |
Nil |
45,000 (20,000 * 2.25) |
11,250 (5,000 * 2.25) |
Conversion cost (C) |
21,300 (6,000 * 3.55) |
71,000 (20,000 * 3.55) |
14,200 (4,000 * 3.55) |
Total cost incurred during the period (D = B + C) |
21,300 |
116,000 |
25,450 |
Total cost (E = A + D) |
57,100 |
116,000 |
25,450 |
Cost incurred during the period = 162,750 (21,300 + 116,000 + 25,450)
Cost of units transferred = 173,100 (57,100 + 116,000)
Cost of ending inventory = 25,450
Total cost accounted for = 198,550 (173,100 + 25,450)
II. For assembly Department
Beginning inventory - 8,000 units which is 50% complete [i.e. Nil material (since material is applied at the end) and 50% conversion cost] at a cost of $61,100 ($45,400 for material and $ 16,700 for conversion).
Computing ending inventory -
Ending inventory = Beginning inventory + Units introduced - Units completed
= 8,000 + 30,000 - 35,000
= 3,000 units which is 50% complete as given in the question
Reconciliation of units
Beginning WIP + Units introduced = Units completed from beginning WIP + Units started and completed + Ending inventory
8,000 (given) + 30,000 (given) = 8,000 (since FIFO method) + 27,000 (total completed units is 35,000 out of which 8,000 are from beginning inventory) + 3,000 (as computed above)
38,000 units = 38,000 units
Material and conversion process incurred during the relevant period in equivalent units
Material |
Conversion cost |
|
Beginning inventory (8,000) |
8,000 (100%) |
4,000 (50%) |
Started and completed (27,000) |
27,000 (100%) |
27,000 (100%) |
Ending inventory (3,000) |
Nil (0%) |
1,500 (50%) |
Total |
35,000 |
32,500 |
Cost incurred during the period (in $) |
39,550 |
136,500 |
Cost per unit |
$ 1.13 (39,550/35,000) |
$ 4.20 (136,500/ 32,500) |
Hence, total cost per unit is $ 5.33 per unit ($1.13 + $4.20).
Computation of cost
Beginning inventory |
Started and completed |
Ending inventory |
|
Opening cost (A) |
62,100 (given) |
- |
- |
Material cost (B) |
9,040 (8,000 * 1.13) |
30,510 (27,000 * 1.13) |
Nil (Nil * 1.13) |
Conversion cost (C) |
16,800 (4,000 * 4.20) |
113,400 (27,000 * 4.20) |
6,300 (1,500 * 4.20) |
Total cost incurred during the period (D = B + C) |
25,840 |
143,910 |
6,300 |
Total cost (E = A + D) |
87,940 |
143,910 |
6,300 |
Cost incurred during the period = 176,050 (25,840 + 143,910 + 6,300)
Cost of units transferred out = 231,850 (87,940 + 143,910)
Cost of ending inventory = 6,300
Total cost accounted for = 238,150 (231,859 + 6,300)
Cost reconciliation
Cost of beginning inventory = 62,100
Cost incurred during the period = 1,76,050
Total = 238,150
Cost of units transferred out = 231,850
Ending WIP = 6,300
Total = 238,150
Lastly, the cost of 30,000 units transferred in Assembly division from Molding division is $ 173,100 (as computed in Part I)
FIFO Muskoge Company FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Molding...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity...
The same problem under FIFO method Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly, In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Beginning...
FIFO Method, Valuation of Goods Transferred Out and Ending Work in Process K-Briggs Company uses the FIFO method to account for the costs of production. For Crushing, the first processing department, the following equivalent units schedule has been prepared: Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units started and completed 28,000 28,000 Units, beginning work in process: 10,000 × 0% — — 10,000 × 40% — 4,000 Units, ending work in process: 6,000 × 100% 6,000 — 6,000 × 75% — 4,500 Equivalent...
Weighted Average Method, FIFO Method, Physical Flow, Equivalent Units Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: All materials are added at the beginning of the process. Beginning work in process had 81,400 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Ending work in process had 12,100 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Started in process, 110,000 units. Required: 1....
Weighted Average Method, FIFO Method, Physical Flow, Equivalent Units Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: All materials are added at the beginning of the process. Beginning work in process had 80,000 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Ending work in process had 17,000 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Started in process, 95,000 units. Required: 1....