Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February:
Molding | Assembly | |||
Beginning inventories: | ||||
Physical units | 10,000 | 8,000 | ||
Costs: | ||||
Transferred in | — | $45,300 | ||
Direct materials | $22,000 | — | ||
Conversion costs | $13,800 | $20,450 | ||
Current production: | ||||
Units started | 25,000 | ? | ||
Units transferred out | 30,000 | 35,000 | ||
Costs: | ||||
Transferred in | — | ? | ||
Direct materials | $56,750 | $40,250 | ||
Conversion costs | $103,500 | $140,150 | ||
Percentage of completion: | ||||
Beginning inventory | 40% | 50% | ||
Ending inventory | 80 | 50 |
Required:
1. Using the weighted average method, prepare the following for the Molding Department:
a. A physical flow schedule
Molding Department, Physical flow schedule: | |
Units to account for: | |
Total units to account for | |
Units accounted for: | |
Units completed and transferred out: | |
Total units accounted for |
b. An equivalent units calculation
Total equivalent units | |
Direct Materials | |
Conversion Costs |
c. Calculation of unit costs. Round your
intermediate computations and final answer to four decimal
places.
$ per unit
d. Calculate the cost of ending work in process
and cost of goods transferred out. Round your answers to the
nearest dollar.
Cost of ending work in process: $
Cost of goods transferred out: $
e. A cost reconciliation. When required, round your answers to the nearest dollar.
Costs to account for: | |
---|---|
Beginning work in process | $ |
Costs incurred | |
Total costs to account for | $ |
Costs accounted for: | |
---|---|
Transferred out | $ |
Ending work in process | |
Total costs accounted for | $ |
2. Prepare journal entries that show the flow of manufacturing costs for the Molding Department. (a) Materials are added at the beginning of the process, (b) conversion costs are recorded, and (c) units are transferred to the Assembly Department. When required, round your answers to the nearest dollar.
a. | |||
b. | |||
c. | |||
3. Repeat Requirements 1 and 2 for the Assembly Department.
a. A physical flow schedule:
Assembly Department, Physical flow schedule: | |
Units to account for: | |
Total units to account for | |
Units accounted for: | |
Units completed and transferred out: | |
Total units accounted for |
b. An equivalent units calculation
Total Equivalent Units | |
Direct Materials | |
Conversion Costs | |
Transferred In |
c. Calculate the total unit costs. Round your
intermediate computations and final answer to four decimal
places.
$ per unit
d. Calculate the cost of ending work in process
and cost of goods transferred out. Round your answers to the
nearest dollar.
Cost of ending work in process: $
Cost of goods transferred out: $
e. A cost reconciliation. If required, round your answers to the nearest dollar.
Costs to account for: | |
---|---|
Beginning work in process | $ |
Costs incurred | |
Total costs to account for | $ |
Costs accounted for: | |
---|---|
Transferred out | $ |
Ending work in process | |
Total costs accounted for | $ |
Note: Cost reconciliation totals differ due to rounding error.
Prepare journal entries that show the flow of manufacturing costs for the Assembly Department. (a) Materials are added at the end of the process, (b) conversion costs are recorded, and (c) the units are transferred to Finished Goods.
a. | |||
b. | |||
c. | |||
1. Using the weighted average method, prepare the following for the Molding Department: | ||||
a. A physical flow schedule | ||||
Molding Department, Physical flow schedule: | ||||
Units to account for: | ||||
Units, beginning work in process | 10,000.00 | |||
Units started in February | 25,000.00 | |||
Total units to account for | 35,000.00 | |||
Units accounted for: | ||||
Units completed and transferred out: | ||||
Started and completed | 20,000.00 | |||
From beginning work in process | 10,000.00 | |||
Units, ending work in process | 5,000.00 | |||
Total units accounted for | 35,000.00 | |||
b. An equivalent units calculation | ||||
Direct Materials | Conversion Costs | |||
Units completed | 30,000.00 | 30,000.00 | ||
Add: Equivalent units in ending work in process | 5,000.00 | 4,000.00 | ||
Total equivalent units | 35,000.00 | 34,000.00 | ||
c. Calculation of unit costs. Round your intermediate computations and final answer to four decimal places. | ||||
Costs charged to the department: | ||||
Direct Materials | Conversion Costs | Total | ||
Costs in beginning work in process | $ 22,000.00 | $ 13,800.00 | $ 35,800.00 | |
Costs added by department | $ 56,750.00 | $ 103,500.00 | $ 160,250.00 | |
Total costs | $ 78,750.00 | $ 117,300.00 | $ 196,050.00 | |
Total equivalent units | 35,000.00 | 34,000.00 | ||
Unit cost = | $ 2.2500 | $ 3.4500 | ||
Unit cost = Unit direct materials cost + Unit conversion costs = $2.2500 + $3.4500 | $ 5.7000 | |||
d. Calculate the cost of ending work in process and cost of goods transferred out. Round your answers to the nearest dollar. | ||||
Cost of goods transferred out (30,000 × $5.7000) | $ 171,000.00 | |||
Cost of ending work in process: | ||||
Direct materials (5,000 × $2.2500) | $ 11,250.00 | |||
Conversion costs (4,000 × $3.4500) | $ 13,800.00 | |||
Total costs in ending work in process | $ 25,050.00 | |||
e. A cost reconciliation. When required, round your answers to the nearest dollar. | ||||
Costs to account for: | ||||
Beginning work in process | $ 35,800.00 | |||
Costs incurred | $ 160,250.00 | |||
Total costs to account for | $ | $ 196,050.00 | ||
Costs accounted for: | ||||
Transferred out | $ 171,000.00 | |||
Ending work in process | $ 25,050.00 | |||
Total costs accounted for | $ 196,050.00 |
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
FIFO Muskoge Company FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Molding...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February:MoldingAssemblyBeginning inventories: Physical...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Beginning...
The same problem under FIFO method Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly, In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production...
Weighted Average Method, FIFO Method, Physical Flow, Equivalent Units Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: All materials are added at the beginning of the process. Beginning work in process had 81,400 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Ending work in process had 12,100 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Started in process, 110,000 units. Required: 1....
Weighted Average Method, FIFO Method, Physical Flow, Equivalent Units Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: All materials are added at the beginning of the process. Beginning work in process had 80,000 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Ending work in process had 17,000 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Started in process, 95,000 units. Required: 1....