Question

Since only about 10% of the criminal cases are settled by trial and approximately 1% are...

Since only about 10% of the criminal cases are settled by trial and approximately 1% are jury trials, why do we focus on them? Why are we so concerned that a trial be fair? Why does so much of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution concern the trial?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Fair trials ensure that governments cannot convict someone or take away their liberty unless they follow fair and just processes. They make sure that anyone accused of a crime can understand what is happening to them.The right to fair trial also means that if a person is accused of a crime, he is innocent until proved guilty. And, he is entitled to legal defence: everyone has a right to get in touch with and get to actually meet a lawyer. This stands even if he cannot afford to pay his legal fees.

The Bill of Rights is a crucial component of the United States Constitution that was designed to ensure the basic rights of the country's citizens.Certain parts of these additional amendments and the Bill of Rights have had a major impact on the criminal justice system. These amendments include the fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and the fourteenth amendments. Their purpose is meant to ensure that people are treated fairly if suspected or arrested for crimes.

The Fifth Amendment states that a person cannot be prosecuted or punished without being given due process. Due process is a person's legal rights under the law which includes being served with notice, and having the right to be heard and defend himself or herself. This ensured that there was an actual criminal procedure that took place, and prevented people from being unjustly taken from their homes and punished without a trial.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. In addition to this, a defendant has the right to a trial that is judged by a jury of his or her peers. During this trial, he or she also has the right to know what the nature of the charges are, have legal representation, and to face any witnesses for the prosecution.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Since only about 10% of the criminal cases are settled by trial and approximately 1% are...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint...

    Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint of the 6th Amendment to tie it back to the Ist! Amendment from last week. Look at the case summary and facts for Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70,127 S. Ct. 649 (2006) A defendant in a murder trial is not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury if courtroom spectators wear buttons showing a picture of the deceased. Facts Matthew...

  • 1.Criminal and civil court cases are different. Consider these two business cases. (i) Civil- In the...

    1.Criminal and civil court cases are different. Consider these two business cases. (i) Civil- In the Liebeck v. McDonald’s case, a woman sued McDonald’s for serving hot coffee. The woman spilled hot coffee on her lap while trying to add cream and sugar. The woman sued McDonald’s for negligence, in a civil suit. The issue centered on whether or not the coffee’s specific temperature was unreasonably hot. McDonald’s lost the lawsuit. The compensatory verdict was $160,000. McDonald’s was found liable....

  • Question 1 [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of...

    Question 1 [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar or novel and even shocking ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States. This quote from the 1905 dissent to the Lochner v. New York decision tells us that Question 1 options: a) the Constitution contains nothing shocking. b) the divisions among people will...

  • Bar Stool Economics Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill...

    Bar Stool Economics Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay $3. The seventh would pay $7. The eighth would pay $12. The ninth would pay $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay...

  • 1. What is the outcome of this case? (Guilty, not guilty, acquitted, etc.) (2-3 sentences) 2....

    1. What is the outcome of this case? (Guilty, not guilty, acquitted, etc.) (2-3 sentences) 2. What is the author's basis of dissent OR basis or support for upholding the opinion of the court? (1 full paragraph) 3. How does this judicial opinion (and general case) increase your understanding of what has been learned/discussed during this time period of the class and the events within it? Explain how this case is historically significant to what we have learned. (I full...

  • There's been a fair amount of talk about income inequality in the U.S. Or more to...

    There's been a fair amount of talk about income inequality in the U.S. Or more to the point, talk about how inequality has been increasing. So has it? And to what extent? Let's take a look at income shares. We can take the income earned by every U.S. resident and add them all up. That's total or aggregate income. Then we can divide households up according to their incomes. Let's think that we put households on a "ladder" according to...

  • Please read and answer the question: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL Facts On July...

    Please read and answer the question: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL Facts On July 15, 2008, Cynthia Anthony, mother of Casey Anthony and grandmother of Caylee Anthony, called 911 to report Casey Anthony for stealing a vehicle and money. In another 911 call, Cynthia Anthony shared with the 911 operator that she learned from Casey of Caylee Anthony’s kidnapping. In addition, Cindy reports of that her daughter’s car “smells like there’s been dead body in the damn car.”...

  • Please read and answer the question: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL Facts On July...

    Please read and answer the question: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL Facts On July 15, 2008, Cynthia Anthony, mother of Casey Anthony and grandmother of Caylee Anthony, called 911 to report Casey Anthony for stealing a vehicle and money. In another 911 call, Cynthia Anthony shared with the 911 operator that she learned from Casey of Caylee Anthony’s kidnapping. In addition, Cindy reports of that her daughter’s car “smells like there’s been dead body in the damn car.”...

  • Can somebody to help with the following questions, I really appreciate with your help: 1) Write...

    Can somebody to help with the following questions, I really appreciate with your help: 1) Write a short summary of the article (2 paragraphs or more). 2) Do you agree or disagree with the author? 3) In your opinion, from the U.S. perspective, what actions should the U.S. take against nations with unfair trade practices? Free Trade Is a Two-Way Street The Trump administration last week celebrated the workers and businesses that make this country great. The purpose of "Made...

  • A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge...

    A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT