Required Rate of Return = r = 21 %
Annual Cash Inflow = CF = $ 1.4 million
Immediate Initial Expenditure = IE = $ 6 million
Ending Closing Expense = ECE = $ 3 million
The project generates the aforementioned cash flows at the end of each year for a period of 10 years. Also, the closing expense is incurred at the end of year 11 and the immediate expense is incurred at end of year 0.
Therefore, Project NPV = - 6 + 1.4 x (1/0.21) x [1-{1/(1.21)^(10)}] - 3 / (1.21)^(11) = - $ 0.6928 or - $ 0.693 million
(a) As the project's NPV is negative it should not be taken up
(b) The immediate expenditure would have to be equal to the PV of the annual cash inflow less the PV of the ending closing expense, so that the project's NPV is zero.
Therefore, Required Immediate Expense = 1.4 x (1/0.21) x [1-{1/(1.21)^(10)}] - [3/(1.21)^(11)] = $ 5.30717 or approximately $ 5.31 million
Problem #2: A mining company is considering whether to develop a mining property. It is estimated...
Problem #2: A mining company is considering whether to develop a mining property. It is estimated that an immediate expenditure of $7 million will be needed to bring the property into production. Thereafter, the net cash inflow will be $1.6 million at the end of each year for the next 10 years. After that, an additional expenditure of $3 million at the end of the 11th year will be required to close down the mine and restore the surrounding area....
A mining company is considering whether to develop a mining property. It is estimated that an immediate expenditure of $7 million will be needed to bring the property into production. Thereafter, the net cash inflow will be $1.4 million at the end of each year for the next 10 years. After that, an additional expenditure of $3 million at the end of the 11th year will be required to close down the mine and restore the surrounding area. For projects...
A mining company is considering whether to develop a mining property. It is estimated that an immediate expenditure of $8 million will be needed to bring the property into production. Thereafter, the net cash inflow will be $1.9 million at the end of each year for the next 10 years. After that, an additional expenditure of $3 million at the end of the 11th year will be required to close down the mine and restore the surrounding area. For projects...
Salter Mining Company purchased the Northern Tier Mine for $13 million cash. The mine was estimated to contain 4.22 million tons of ore and to have a residual value of $2.2 million. During the first year of mining operations at the Northern Tier Mine, 65,000 tons of ore were mined, of which 12,000 tons were sold. a. Prepare a journal entry to record depletion during the year. b. Show how the Northern Tier Mine, and its accumulated depletion, would appear...
Problem 6-15 Nash Mining Company recently purchased a quartz mine that it intends to work for the next 10 years. According to state environmental laws, Nash must restore the mine site to its original natural prairie state after it ceases mining operations at the site. To properly account for the mine, Nash must estimate the fair value of this asset retirement obligation. This amount will be recorded as a liability and added to the value of the mine on Nash's...
Question 1 Extractive Industries (18 marks) ABC Mining company paid $5.6 million for a mining property on 1 July 2016 after the geologists of the exploration company estimated that a gold deposit found on the property would produce 42 000 ounces of gold. In each of the years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018, ABC spent $225 000 per annum developing the property and, during 2017-2018, the company purchased and installed the following assets: Estimated useful life Asset Cost Mine building $500 000...
17.A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $66 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $22 million per year for 5 years. If the...
CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year...
CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $11 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $69 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $23 million per year...
CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9 million at Year O to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $51 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $17 million per year...