Prove: A finite set of real numbers is bounded.

Question

Question

Answer 1

Answer #1

Let A be a finite set of rea number ASSume LArAmanty of Set A s h Without loss oft generality, e assume A 4,,a3, -- an3 SUen

Answer 2

Similar Homework Help Questions

2. Let A be a nonempty set of real numbers bounded above. Define Prove that -A...

2. Let A be a nonempty set of real numbers bounded above. Define Prove that -A is bounded below, and that inf(-A) = -sup(A). -A={-a: aEA . (5 marks) (You may use results proved in class.) A = 0 , A is bounded above.
Prove that a bounded set in R2 with a finite number of accumulation points has content...

Prove that a bounded set in R2 with a finite number of accumulation points has content 0.
Prove that a bounded set in R2 with a finite number of accumulation points has content 0.

Prove that a bounded set in R2 with a finite number of accumulation points has content 0.

Real Math Analysis Let A be a nonempty finite subset of R. Prove that A is...

Real Math Analysis Let A be a nonempty finite subset of R. Prove that A is compact. Follow the comment and be serious Please. our goal is to show that we can find a finite subcover in A. However, I got stuck in finding the subcover. It is becasue finite subset means the set is bounded but it doesn't mean it is closed.
Prove that the real numbers have the least upper bound property, i.e. any bounded above subset S ...

Prove that the real numbers have the least upper bound property, i.e. any bounded above subset S ⊆ R has a supremum if and only if the real numbers have the greatest lower bound property, i.e. any bounded below subset T ⊆ R has an infimum.
Suppose we tried to apply our real analysis definitions/methods to the set of rational numbers Q....

Suppose we tried to apply our real analysis definitions/methods to the set of rational numbers Q. In other words, in the definitions, we only consider rational numbers. E.g., [0, 1] now means [0, 1] ∩ Q, etc. In this setting: (a) Find an open cover of [0, 1] that contains no finite subcover. Hint: Fix an irrational number α ∈ [0, 1] (as a subset of the reals now!) and for each (rational) q ∈ [0, 1] look for an...

Problem 1 [10 points] Prove that if A is a nonempty set of real numbers with...

Problem 1 [10 points] Prove that if A is a nonempty set of real numbers with a lower bound and B is a nonempty subset of A, then inf A <inf B. Problem 2 [10 points) Let A be a nonempty set of real numbers with a lower bound. Prove there exists a sequence (ar) =1 such that are A for all n and we have limntan = inf A.
Let (xn) be a bounded sequence of real numbers, and put u = lim supn→∞ xn . Let E be the set consisting of the limits of all convergent subsequences of (xn). Show that u ∈ E and that u = sup(E). Form...

Let (xn) be a bounded sequence of real numbers, and put u = lim supn→∞ xn . Let E be the set consisting of the limits of all convergent subsequences of (xn). Show that u ∈ E and that u = sup(E). Formulate and prove a similar result for lim infn→∞ xn . Thank you! 7. Let (Fm) be a bounded sequence of real numbers, and put u-lim supn→oorn . Let E be the set consisting of the limits of...
9. Suppose {X,.) are iid, EIX1く00, EX| = 0 and suppose that {cal is a bounded sequence of real numbers. Prove ή 2....

9. Suppose {X,.) are iid, EIX1く00, EX| = 0 and suppose that {cal is a bounded sequence of real numbers. Prove ή 2.cjX, → 0 a.s (If necessary, examine the proof of the SLLN.) 9. Suppose {X,.) are iid, EIX1く00, EX| = 0 and suppose that {cal is a bounded sequence of real numbers. Prove ή 2.cjX, → 0 a.s (If necessary, examine the proof of the SLLN.)

(2) (a) Prove that the set G = {+1, £i} is a finite subgroup of the...

(2) (a) Prove that the set G = {+1, £i} is a finite subgroup of the multi- plicative group CX of nonzero complex numbers, and that the set H = {E1} is a finite subgroup of {+1, £i}. (b) Compute the index of H in G. (c) Compute the set of left cosets G/H.