BFS is a traversing algorithm where you should start traversing from a selected node (source or starting node) and traverse the graph layerwise thus exploring the neighbour nodes (nodes which are directly connected to source node). You must then move towards the next-level neighbour nodes.
Now from the given bipartite graph, let's start the BFS traversal.
From source a:
1. From a, we have two children i.e d and f. So let's explore d
a-->d
2. d has only one children i.e b, so take b in.
a --> d --> b
3. Now come back to a and explore other children of a i.e f.
a --> d --> b --> f
4. f has two children a and c. SInce a has been discovered so take c in
a --> d --> b --> f --> c
5. c has two children i.e e and g and both are leaf nodes. So take both in
a --> d --> b --> f --> c --> e --> g
Hence, the BFS traversal here is
a --> d --> b --> f --> c --> e --> g
From source d:
1. d has two children a and b. So let's take b first
d --> b
2. Then return to a and discover the other children i.e a
d --> b --> a
3. a has two children d and f. since d has been discovered so take f in
d --> b --> a --> f
4. f has two children i.e a and c. SInce a is discovered to so take c in.
d --> b --> a --> f --> c
5. Now c has two children i.e e and g and both are leaf nodes. So take both in
d --> b --> a --> f --> c --> e --> g
Hence, the BFS traversal here is
d --> b --> a --> f --> c --> e --> g
- The similarity between the both BFS traversals is that after the 3 nodes traversal, rest of the nodes traversal is all same.
- In BFS algorithm, In general, when the bfs reaches a node, you go through its neighbours and check if any of them is already visited and on the same side as your node is. Then, the graph is not bipartite. If you reach the end of the bfs with no errors, then the graph is bipartite.
Bipartite graph is a graph, which vertices can be partitioned into 2 parts - so that...
A bipartite graph is a graph in which the vertices can be divided into two disjoint nonempty sets A and B such that no two vertices in A are adjacent and no two vertices in B are adjacent. The complete bipartite graph Km,n is a bipartite graph in which |A| = m and |B| = n, and every vertex in A is adjacent to every vertex in B. (a) Sketch K3,2. (b) How many edges does Km,n have? (c) For...
Problem 8. (2+4+4 points each) A bipartite graph G = (V. E) is a graph whose vertices can be partitioned into two (disjoint) sets V1 and V2, such that every edge joins a vertex in V1 with a vertex in V2. This means no edges are within V1 or V2 (or symbolically: Vu, v E V1. {u, u} &E and Vu, v E V2.{u,v} &E). 8(a) Show that the complete graph K, is a bipartite graph. 8(b) Prove that no...
Consider the graph at right. 17 15 [a] In what order are the vertices visited using DFS 319 1 starting from vertex a? Where a choice exists, use alphabetical order. What if you use BFS? [b A vertex x is "finished" when the recursive call DFS (x) terminates. In what order are the vertices finished? (This is different from the order in which they are visited, when DFS (x) is called.) [c] In what order are edges added to the...
3. (a) Let Knbe the complete bipartite graph with n vertices in each part of its bipartition, where n 21. Determine the number of perfect matchings of Kn (b) A matching M in a graph Gis ca a mazimal matching if there exists no matching M' of G such that M is a proper subset of M' Prove that, for any graph G and any edges e,f of G which are not incident with a common vertex, there exists a...
Discrete Math: Please help with all parts of question 5. I have included problem 3 to help answer part (a) but I only need help with question 5! 5. 3. (a) (4 points) Prove that a graph is bipartite if and only if there is a 2-coloring (see problem 3) of its vertices. (b) (4 points) Prove that if a graph is a tree with at least two vertices, then there is a 2-coloring of its vertices. (Hint: Here are...
Recall the definition of the degree of a vertex in a graph. a) Suppose a graph has 7 vertices, each of degree 2 or 3. Is the graph necessarily connected ? b) Now the graph has 7 vertices, each degree 3 or 4. Is it necessarily connected? My professor gave an example in class. He said triangle and a square are graph which are not connected yet each vertex has degree 2. (Paul Zeitz, The Art and Craft of Problem...
Run Dijkstra's algorithm on the graph G below, where s is the source vertex. Draw a table that shows the vertices in Q at each iteration. Write thed and I values of each vertex. Color the edges in the shortest-path tree, similar to the example from the notes. List the order in which vertices are added to S. Use the algorithm learned in class.
question 1 and 2 please, thank you. 1. In the following graph, suppose that the vertices A, B, C, D, E, and F represent towns, and the edges between those vertices represent roads. And suppose that you want to start traveling from town A, pass through each town exactly once, and then end at town F. List all the different paths that you could take Hin: For instance, one of the paths is A, B, C, E, D, F. (These...
please help me make this into a contradiction or a direct proof please. i put the question, my answer, and the textbook i used. thank you also please write neatly proof 2.5 Prove har a Simple sraph and 13 cdges cannot be bipartite CHint ercattne gr apn in to ertex Sets and Court tne忤of edges Claim Splitting the graph into two vertex, Sets ves you a 8 Ver ices So if we Change tne书 apn and an A bipartite graph...
Run Prim (starting from vertex "f") and Kruskal algorithms on the graph below: 3 2 9 3 . (5 points) Prim's algorithm: draw a table that shows the vertices in the queue at each iteration, similar to example from the notes (2 points) Prim's algorithm: using the table from the first part, list the order in which edges are added to the tree (3 points) Kruskal's algorithm: list the order in which edges are added to the tree