This article throws the light on the gap in the employment involvement of men and women. The article indicates that due to the absence from the labor force during the age group of 30-40 tears which is considered as the most productive age, the women tend to have a negative impact on the chances of advancement, reduced lifetime income and wastage of time and money spent on the education.
On the other hand, the article also shows that there is a negative impact of the early retirement of Japanese people due to the government policy of retirement at the age of 60 years. Due to relatively longer lifespan, higher literacy, and numeracy skills, these people can still contribute to the economy of the country even after working beyond 60 years of age.
Due to the compulsory retirement age of 60, if these people want to rejoin the workforce, they are limited due to lower wage rates offered to them.
The overall impression of the article is to focus on the age and the productivity and how different age group can contribute to the economy. People must work when they can contribute productivity to the economy and if there is a restriction of age, it must be overcome by the government policies. This will also benefit the workers in the form of greater income generation.
Japan Wasting Women's Potential Laborforce participation rates ■Men-Japan ■Women-Japan ■Men-EU 15 countries 100% -women-EU 15 countries...