Question

Mary Barnes was employed by the Big Sky Distributing Company of Laramie, Wyoming [324 full time employees]. She worked at an off-site location near Laramie keeping track of the inventory in that facility. Mary was the only female in the building and Milton, her supervisor, subjected her to occasional verbal abuse. Milton had never received training concerning sexual harassment in his eight years with the company.] He often used vulgar language to refer to women, regularly told lewd jokes and made gestures insulting women in her presence but never directly addressed Mary. In addition to putting up with Milton's comments, Mary grew tired of the behavior of Buford, the Office Supply salesmen who came by every month to take orders and make deliveries. Buford commented on her breasts and often asked her, with a smirk, if she was interested in going to the rodeo with him to see the "bucking broncos in action. Mary became increasingly frustrated and decided to quit She never reviewed the firm's sexual harassment policy contained in the employee handbook. To avoid angering her spouse, an intensely jealous man, Mary never filed a complaint with the company's EEO hotline or complained to the HR office about the behavior of Milton or Buford. Also, following services one Sunday shortly after Buford's "bucking bronco" remark she complained about Buford, who happened to be a member of her congregation, to Abel, another member of her church and the deputy general manager at Big Sky [who had also never received training in sexual harassment] when they bumped into each other in the church parking lot. Abel nodded his head sympathetically and said he would pray for Buford's redemption but declined to speak with him out of concern over distressing Buford's wife. Explain what Mary must prove [i.e., state each element of the prima facie case and analyze the facts to see if evidence exists in support] norderto maintain case for sexual harassment and specify what type of sexual harassment, if any, she could allege against Big Sky.. [Assume that she has filed a timely charge with the EEOC, that the agency found no reasonable cause for the charge and issued a Right to Sue letter.] Discuss how the court would rule on Big Sky's attempt to avoid liability for the actions of (A) Milton and (B) Buford. Be sure to explain the standard the court would apply under Title VII for employer liability for the actions of (A) Milton and (B) Buford.] Who would win if the case winds up in federal court? Would the result be the same if the conduct occurred in California? Be sure to explain your answer

Answer 1

besulat to not tove adeqntes polrcy to prevent sea hjOssment a4wrk place and -they do ro f tro4mnce ond tonntoet the hor o sment satttor behove uhen Mary treio com plain readng m Buforai to the r ea mono followed in Cale at Serual horayment to Mavy fram seaharassment ond tok er ecessut shuld be onducted in ork place which ha onan dut ey con tesson tfe fect h Corporoting the steps in workplace tu efsxe prevertior of seuual harassmenthey shoutd aspot esual oteie start ivingdateonigto d epoyees velae haro ssment and verse Lo sexua the Cabe wino up in Federal cot o d the cse.. the title il under edeal ohbt tua hao ssmenthose oervivone and Vebal conduct of seia o nons a the e sexual haassment Cos Cose) comes unde ri em ploy ment n ousng Aet hrch prohs Sendal harassment ‘ 化 圦 爻Y/cher.tan -He ν!! ㅎ

. , he creation of, teedel e 人ork enviro man t. -For Mary -through Un Welcome? Verbal abase gr炓 .Qs? ensuweventton untual hara ssmert and the mployer tr old have-to Foxy more
if you have any query just ask me how.i am here to helps you. dont give you direct thums down.if you satishfied to my work please give me vote for THUMS UP. THANK YOU SO MUCH