Equipment is being leased from a dealer for $500,000 per year with beginning of year payments and the lease expires three years from now. It is estimated that a new lease for the succeeding four years on similar new equipment will provide the same service and will cost $750,000 per year with beginning of year payments. The first payment under the new lease occurs at the beginning of year four. The equipment manufacturer is offering to terminate the present lease today and to sell the lessee new equipment for $2 million now which together with a major repair cost of $600,000 at the end of year four should provide the needed equipment service for a total of seven years, after which, the salvage value is estimated to be zero. Use present worth cost analysis for a minimum rate of return of 20% to determine if leasing or purchasing is economically the best approach to provide the equipment service for the next seven years. Verify your conclusion with ROR and NPV analysis, respectively. Please work this problem through excel or explain how you would come to the conclusion using excel.
Equipment is being leased from a dealer for $500,000 per year with beginning of year payments...
On January 1, 2018, Lesco Leasing leased equipment to Quality Services under a finance/sales- type lease designed to earn NRC a 12% rate of return for providing long-term financing. The lease agreement specified: a. Ten annual payments of $56,000 beginning January 1, 2018, the beginning of the lease and each December 31 thereafter through 2026. b. The estimated useful life of the leased equipment is 10 years with no residual value. Its cost to Lesco was $322,741. c. The lease...
Taylor Company leased an asset from Lease Corp. using an operating lease for equipment with a useful life of seven years. The initial lease term was for three years. After two years, Taylor Company and Lease Corp. agree to extend the lease term by four years, and to change the amount of lease payments. The additional four years were not originally an option. The increase in present value of lease payments for Taylor is $200,000. The present value of the...
Taylor Company leased an asset from Lease Corp. using an operating lease for equipment with a useful life of seven years. The initial lease term was for three years. After two years, Taylor Company and Lease Corp. agree to extend the lease term by four years, and to change the amount of lease payments. The additional four years were not originally an option. The increase in present value of lease payments for Taylor is $200,000. The present value of the...
On January 1, 2021, Lesco Leasing leased equipment to Quality Services under a finance/sales-type lease designed to earn NRC a 12% rate of return for providing long-term financing. The lease agreement specified: (FV of $1, PV of $1, FVA of $1, PVA of $1, FVAD of $1 and PVAD of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.) Ten annual payments of $56,000 beginning January 1, 2021, the beginning of the lease and each December 31 thereafter through 2029. The...
On January 1, 2018, Lesco Leasing leased equipment to Quality Services under a finance/sales-type lease designed to earn NRC a 12% rate of return for providing longterm financing. The lease agreement specified: (FVof 1, PV of $1, FVA of $1, PVA of $1, FVAD of $1 and PVAD of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.) a. Ten annual payments of $56,000 beginning January 1, 2018, the beginning of the lease and each December 31 thereafter through 2026 b....
Francisco leased equipment from Julio on December 31, 2018. The lease is a 10-year lease with annual payments of $158,000 due on December 31 of each year beginning December 31, 2018. The present value of the lease payments is $1,030,000. Francisco's incremental borrowing rate is 12% for this type of lease. The implicit rate of 11% is known by the lessee. What should be the balance in Francisco lease liability at December 31, 2019?
Corinth Co. leased non-specialized equipment to Athens Corporation for an eight-year period, at which time possession of the equipment will revert back to Corinth. The equipment cost Corinth $16 million and has an expected useful life of 12 years. Its normal sales price is $22.4 million. The present value of the lease payments for both the lessor and lessee is $20.6 million. The first payment was made at the beginning of the lease. How should Corinth classify this lease? My...
Corinth Co. leased non-specialized equipment to Athens Corporation for an eight-year period, at which time possession of the equipment will revert back to Corinth. The equipment cost Corinth $16 million and has an expected useful life of twelve years. Its normal sales price is $22.4 million. The present value of the lease payments for both the lessor and lessee is $20.6 million. The first payment was made at the beginning of the lease. How should Corinth classify this lease? Operating...
Francisco leased equipment from Julio on December 31, 2021. The lease is a 10-year lease with annual payments of $160,000 due on December 31 of each year beginning December 31, 2021. The present value of the lease payments is $1,045,928. Francisco's incremental borrowing rate is 13% for this type of lease. The implicit rate of 11% is known by the lessee. What should be the balance in Francisco lease liability at December 31, 2022? Multiple Choice $819,880. $885,928. $829,890. $823,380.
On January 1, 2021, NRC Credit Corporation leased equipment to Brand Services under a finance/sales-type lease designed to earn NRC a 10% rate of return for providing long-term financing. The lease agreement specified the following: Ten annual payments of $66,000 beginning January 1, 2021, the beginning of the lease and each December 31 thereafter through 2029. The estimated useful life of the leased equipment is 10 years with no residual value. Its cost to NRC was $412,300. The lease qualifies...