Fifty matched pairs of magnitude/depth measurements randomly selected from 10,594 earthquakes recorded in one year from a location in southern California. Find the best predicted depth of an earthquake with a magnitude of 1.8. Use a significance level of 0.05 from table = .279.
Mag Depth
2.61 13.5
0.78 11.9
2.63 19.4
1.51 13.2
1.73 9.2
0.22 11.7
2.22 16.9
0.79 3.9
0.02 8.7
2.66 6.8
1.25 18.8
0.98 7.7
1.95 19.4
2.63 2.1
2.41 11.5
1.77 3.8
1.82 14.7
0.17 19.8
0.36 3.5
0.94 19.5
1.87 10.7
0.99 10.7
1.62 6.2
2.44 4.9
0.52 11.7
2.74 12.1
0.79 14.5
2.68 17.4
2.21 5.7
2.86 15.7
0.29 3.8
0.48 9.3
2.04 4.4
2.62 11.7
0.83 10.1
1.47 8.9
2.69 11.5
0.21 16.4
1.15 10.1
0.43 16.8
2.46 13.8
2.49 17.5
1.17 13.5
2.99 18.1
0.75 11.7
1.45 10.9
2.04 12.8
2.12 15.2
1.51 9.3
1.67 11.5
The regression equation is y (with caret) ___ + ___x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Given that the earthquake has a magnitude of 1.8, the best predicted depth is ___km. (Round to one decimal place as needed.)
applying regression on above data:
regression equation is y (with caret) =10.8+0.6*x
best predicted depth is =10.8+0.6*1.8 =11.9 km
Fifty matched pairs of magnitude/depth measurements randomly selected from 10,594 earthquakes recorded in one year from...
Fifty matched pairs of magnitude/depth measurements randomly selected from 10,594 earthquakes recorded in one year from a location in southern California. Find the best predicted depth of an earthquake with a magnitude of 1.3 Use a significance level of 0.05 Mag Depth 1.74 2.1 2.75 14.6 2.21 13.4 2.06 3.9 2.42 13.7 0.99 17.4 1.03 4.7 1.81 4.8 2.83 15.2 0.45 17.2 2.67 18.3 2.61 8.3 0.87 4.1 1.32 9.1 1.66 15.7 1.38 19.3 1.13 9.4 0.94 15.3 0.54 2.7...