Use the definitions:
x ∈ S ∩ T iff (x ∈ S) ∧ (x ∈ T)
x ∈ S' iff ¬(x ∈ S)
S ⊆ T iff (∀x)(x ∈ S → X ∈ T)
1. Prove line-by-line:
r → ¬(p → q)
assuming that ¬r ∨ ¬q and ¬(q ∧ r) ∧ p
2. A, B, C & A ⊆ B are sets.
Prove:
Define a relation < on Z by m <n iff |m| < |n| or (\m| = |n| 1 m <n) (a) Prove that < is a partial order on Z. (b) A partial order R on a set S is called a total order (or linear order) iff (Vx, Y ES)(x + y + ((x, y) E R V (y,x) E R)) Prove that is a total order on Z. (c) List the following elements in <-increasing order. –5, 2,...
Assume n is an integer. Prove that n is odd iff 3n2 + 4 is odd. Remember that to prove p iff q, you need to prove (i) p → q, and (ii) q → p. Use the fact that any odd n can be expressed as 2k + 1 and any even n can be expressed as 2k, where k is an integer. No other assumptions should be made.
help please and thank you
3. The symbole, also called XOR, is the logic operation modeling the exclusive OR. We will define Peas -(P Q). (a) Give a truth table that fully describes P Q. (Just like the other logic operations were defined in Lecture 3.) (b) State what it would mean for 2 to be commutative and associative, and then prove or disprove your statements. (c) Let A, B be sets. Prove that r e AAB iff (x E...
1. Use the DPP to decide whether the following sets of clauses are satisfiable. (a) {{¬Q,T},{P,¬Q},{¬Q,¬S},{¬P,¬R},{P,¬R,S},{Q,S,¬T},{¬P,S,¬T},{Q,¬S},{Q,R,T}} (b) {{¬Q,R,T},{¬P,¬R},{¬P,S,¬T},{P,¬Q},{P,¬R,S},{Q,S,¬T},{¬Q,¬S},{¬Q,T}} 2. Decide whether each of the following arguments are valid by first converting to a question of satisfiability of clauses (see the Proposition), and then using the DPP. (Note that using DPP is not the easiest way to decide validity for these arguments, so you may want to use other methods to check your answers) (a) (P → Q), (Q → R),...
clear and clean
answer,pls
2. Suppose S and T are nonempty sets of real numbers with the following property: (P) There exists y in T such that for all x in S, y>x. Prove the following (of course, use the standard approach for proving universally and existentially quantified statements): (Q) For all x in S, there exists y in T such that y>x.
2. Suppose S and T are nonempty sets of real numbers with the following property: (P) There...
Set Proof:
1. Prove that if S and T are finite sets with |S| = n and |T| =
m, then |S U T| <= (n + m)
2. Prove that finite set S = T if and only if (iff) (S
Tc) U (Sc T) =
We were unable to transcribe this imageWe were unable to transcribe this imageWe were unable to transcribe this image
2. Suppose S and T are nonempty sets of real numbers with the following property: (P) There exists y in T such that for all x in S, y>x. Prove the following (of course, use the standard approach for proving universally and existentially quantified statements): (Q) For all x in S, there exists y in T such that y>x.
#7. TRUE/FALSE. Determine the truth value of each sentence (no explanation required). ________(a) k in Z k2 + 9 = 0. ________(b) m, n in N, 5m 2n is in N. ________(c) x in R, if |x − 2| < 3, then |x| < 5. #8. For each statement, (i) write the statement in logical form with appropriate variables and quantifiers, (ii) write the negation in logical form, and (iii) write the negation in a clearly worded unambiguous English sentence....
4. Let S = {1,2,3). Define a relation R on SxS by (a, b)R(c,d) iff a <c and b <d, where is the usual less or equal to on the integers. a. Prove that R is a partial order. Is R a linear order? b. Draw the poset diagram of R.
Prove: A x B = ∅ iff. A = ∅ or B = ∅