Question

FINANCE Ch 5 Time Value of Money KQuestion 2 (of 5) 5.00 points Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably During 2003 an auction house sold a sculpture at auction for a price of $10,241,500 Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 2000 at a price of $12 237,500 should be indicated by a minus What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (Negative amount sign. Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g. 32.16) Annual rate of return Hints References eBook & Resources
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

We can use either both Future Value or the Present Value formula. We will use the FV formula,

FV = PV(1 + r)t

Solving for r, we get

r = (FV / PV)1/t - 1

r = ($10,241,500 / $12,237,500)1/3 - 1

r = - 5.76%

Notice that the interest rate is negative. This occurs when the FV is less than the PV

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
FINANCE Ch 5 Time Value of Money KQuestion 2 (of 5) 5.00 points Although appealing to...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably...

    Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably During 2003, an auction house sold a sculpture at auction for a price of $10,321,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1998 at a price of $12,397,500 What was his annual rate of retun on this sculpture? (Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2...

  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably....

    Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, an auction house sold a sculpture at auction for a price of $10,211,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 2000 at a price of $12,177,500.    What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent...

  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably...

    Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably During 2003, an auction house sold a sculpture at auction for a price of $10,281,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1998 at a price of $12,317,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2...

  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably....

    Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. Assume that in 2015, an auction house sold a statute at auction for a price of $10,584,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 2008 at a price of $12,624,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture?

  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably....

    Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. Assume that in 2015, an auction house sold a statute at auction for a price of $10,437,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 2009 at a price of $12,491,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a...

  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably....

    Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2016, a sculpture was sold at auction for a price of $10,316,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 2012 at a price of $12,385,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? Multiple Choice -3.80% 4.68% -5.05% -4.47% -4.02%

  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably....

    Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2015, an auction house sold a painting for a price of $1,190,000. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it three years earlier at a price of $1,770,000. What was his annual rate of return on this painting?

  • Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably....

    Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2015, an auction house sold a painting for a price of $1,160,000. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it three years earlier at a price of $1,740,000. What was his annual rate of return on this painting? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to...

  • please show all work 8. Calculating Rates of Return Although appealing to more refined tastes, art...

    please show all work 8. Calculating Rates of Return Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. In 2010, Deutscher-Menzies sold Arkie,Under the Shower, a painting by renowned Australian painter Brett Whiteley, at auction for a price of $1,100,000. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it three years earlier at a price of $1,680,000. What was his annual rate of return on this painting?

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT