Question

Three mutualy exclusive das gn aternatives are being cons dered The estimated cash flows for each ater at e are g en below Th

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

(a) Option (B)

Alternative A has highest Present Worth, so this alternative is most economical.

(b) Discounted Payback Period (DPBP) is the year when the project's cumulative discounted cash flow is zero.

Net Cash Flow (NCF) ($) = Annual revenue - Annual cost

NCF, Alternative A = 79,397 - 17,368 = 62,029

NCF, Alternative B = 48,665 - 10,941 = 37,724

NCF, Alternative C = 96,112 - 22,944 = 73,168

Alternative - A
Year NCF ($) PV Factor @12% Discounted NCF ($) Cumulative Discounted NCF ($)
0 -2,75,000 1.0000 -2,75,000 -2,75,000
1 62,029 0.8929 55,383 -2,19,617
2 64,757 0.7972 51,624 -1,67,993
3 64,757 0.7118 46,093 -1,21,900
4 64,757 0.6355 41,154 -80,746
5 64,757 0.5674 36,745 -44,001
6 64,757 0.5066 32,808 -11,193
7 64,757 0.4523 29,293 18,099
Alternative - B
Year NCF ($) PV Factor @12% Discounted NCF ($) Cumulative Discounted NCF ($)
0 -1,40,000 1.0000 -1,40,000 -1,40,000
1 37,724 0.8929 33,682 -1,06,318
2 37,724 0.7972 30,073 -76,245
3 37,724 0.7118 26,851 -49,393
4 37,724 0.6355 23,974 -25,419
5 37,724 0.5674 21,406 -4,013
6 37,724 0.5066 19,112 15,099
Alternative - C
Year NCF ($) PV Factor @12% Discounted NCF ($) Cumulative Discounted NCF ($)
0 -3,70,000 1.0000 -3,70,000 -3,70,000
1 73,168 0.8929 65,329 -3,04,671
2 73,168 0.7972 58,329 -2,46,342
3 73,168 0.7118 52,080 -1,94,263
4 73,168 0.6355 46,500 -1,47,763
5 73,168 0.5674 41,517 -1,06,246
6 73,168 0.5158 37,743 -68,503
7 73,168 0.4689 34,312 -34,191
8 73,168 0.4263 31,193 -2,998
9 73,168 0.3876 28,357 25,359

If DPBP is between two successive years (N - 1) & N,

DPBP = (N - 1) + [Absolute value of cumulative discounted NCF in year (N - 1) / Discounted NCF in year N]

DPBP of Alternative A lies between year 6 and 7. DPBP of Alternative B lies between year 5 and 6. DPBP of Alternative C lies between year 8 and 9.

DPBP, Alternative A = 6 + (11,193 / 29,293) = 6 + 0.38 = 6.38 ~ 6 years

DPBP, Alternative B = 5 + (4,013 / 19,112) = 5 + 0.21 = 5.21 ~ 5 years

DPBP, Alternative C = 8 + (2,998 / 28,357) = 8 + 0.11 = 8.11 ~ 8 years

(ii) Option (D)

Alternative B has minimum DPBP, so this alternative preferred.

(c) Option (A)

The Payback period ignores cash flows after cut-off period and after the actual payback period, so its evaluation is different from that of PW method.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Three mutualy exclusive das gn aternatives are being cons dered The estimated cash flows for each...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each wernative we...

    Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each wernative we given below. The study period is 30 years and the firm's MARR is 6% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 6 per year a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Aheative 1?...

  • Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen). The...

    Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen). The MARR is 12% per year. Capital Investment Annual expenses Useful life Market value at end of useful life Lead Acid $8,000 $2,250 12 years $0 Lithium lon $13,000 $2,300 18 years $2,800 Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when /= 12% per year. (a) Determine which altemative should be selected based on the PW method. Assume repeatabllity...

  • Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...

    Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. B Investment cost Annual expenses Annual revenues Market value Useful life $28,000 $15,000 $23,000 $6,000 10 years 10 years 10 years 26.4% $55,000 $40,000 $22,000 $32,000 $10,000 $13,000 $28,000 $8,000 24.7% 22.4% IRR A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to...

  • Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen). The...

    Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen). The MARR is 5% per year. I need the PW of the Lead Acid and Lithium Ion. Problem 6-28 (algorithmic) EQuestion Help Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen) The MARR is 5% per year ead Acid $7,000 thium lon Capital investment Annual expenses Useful life Market value at end of useful life $13,000 $2.500 $2,750 12...

  • Problems 4 The cash flows for three mutually exclusive alternatives are given in table below use...

    Problems 4 The cash flows for three mutually exclusive alternatives are given in table below use MARR = 4% Initial cost Annual benefits RoR Life in years Alt. A $11,000 $3.500 15% Alt. B $23,000 $6,500 13% Alt. C $20,000 $5,500 11% Which alternative should be selected based on a Payback period and () Net Future Worth analyses

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT