Alternative A.
Payback period = 11000/3500 = 3.142
. Net present worth = -11000*1.04^5 +3500(F/A,4%,5)
= $ 5,573.94
Alternative B.
Payback period = 23000/6600 = 3.48 years
Net future worth = - 23000*1.04^5 + 6600*(1.04^5 -0.04×5-1)/(0.04) = $ 7764.21
Alternative C
Payback period = 20000/5500 = 3.64
Net FW = -20000×1.04^5 + 5500(F/A,4%,5)
FW = $ 5,456.71
Option B has highest FW thus select B.
On the basis of Payback period alternative A is better.
Problems 4 The cash flows for three mutually exclusive alternatives are given in table below use...
The cash flows for three different alternatives are given in table below. Based on AROR analysis, the best alternative, for a MARR of = 19%, is Alt. A Alt. B Alt. C Initial Cost $5,000 9,000 7,500 Annual Benefits $1,457 2,518 2,133 12.4% ROR 14% 13% Life in years 5 Alt.A Do nothing Alt. C Alt.B
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each wernative we given below. The study period is 30 years and the firm's MARR is 6% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 6 per year a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Aheative 1?...
4. (10 points) A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The alternatives are: Initial Cost $20,000 $30,000 $50,000 Uniform Annual Benefit $4,000 $5,000 $6,500 Useful Life Salvage Value $2,000 $9,000 The MARR is 10%. Which alternative do you recommend? Be sure to use the proper technique when comparing alternatives with different useful lives.
QUESTION 6 Data for two mutually exclusive alternatives are given below. Alternatives B $4,000 $800 А Initial Cost $5,000 Annual Benefits (beginning at end of $1,500 year 1) Annual Costs (beginning at end of year $500 1) Salvage Value $500 Useful Life (years) 5 $200 $0 10 Compute the net present worth for each alternative and choose the better alternative. MARR = 8%
Question 1 The cash flows given in table below are for two different alternatives. MARR =10% Data IN Initial Cost Annual Benefits Salvage Value Useful Life in years M $20,000 $6,000 $5,000 $80,000 $10,000 $20,000 a) Determine the annual worth of alternative M b) Determine the annual worth of alternative N
Problem (2): Consider the following three mutually exclusive alternatives. MARR is 10%. Alternative 1 10,000 Alternative 2 14,500 Alternative 3 20,000 $3,000 increasing by 500 each year thereafter negligible $5,000 Initial investment Annual yielded returns Salvage Value Service life $5,000 $5,000 negligible 6 a) Compute the payback (PB) period and discounted PB period of each alternative. Based on the PB period, which alternative do you recommend? b) Using Annual-worth analysis, which alternative do you recommend?
international genetic technologies inc. (InGen) is examining the following three mutually exclusive alternatives. 3) Using benefit-cost ratio analysis, a 10-year useful life and a MARR of 25%, determine which of the following mutually exclusive models should be selected. А в C D E Initial Cost $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $37 $60 $83 $137 $150 Annual Benefits 4) A big box company is using a benefit-cost ratio analysis to select which one of the 3 alternatives shown below should be...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. B Investment cost Annual expenses Annual revenues Market value Useful life $28,000 $15,000 $23,000 $6,000 10 years 10 years 10 years 26.4% $55,000 $40,000 $22,000 $32,000 $10,000 $13,000 $28,000 $8,000 24.7% 22.4% IRR A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to...
9-54 Three mutually exclusive alternatives are beine A considered: $500 $400 $300 200 100 Initial cost Benefit at end of the first 200 200 year Uniform benefit at end of 100 125 subsequent years Useful life, in years 4 At the end of its useful life, an alternative is not replaced. If the MARR is 10%, which alternative should be selected (a) Based on the payback period? (b) Based on benefit-cost ratio analysis? 9-54 Three mutually exclusive alternatives are beine...
USE ANNUAL WORTH Analysis Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given in the following table with MARR = 10% per year. Suggest your recommendation by using multiple attribute annual worth AW analysis. Design A Design B Investment cost (RM) 28,000 55,000 One-off expenses 10,000 13,000 In year 4 (RM) Annual revenues (RM) 22,000 28,000 Market value (RM) 6,000 8,000 Useful life 10 years 6 years