Solution :-
We should Reject Alternative C as in this ROR (8%) is less than MARR (9%)
Now we need to compare between Alternative A and B
As we need to compare with incremental ROR
Now we need to make life of both alternatives same to compare
So Assume that after 3 year we again invest for 3 years in alternative A .
So in case of Alternative A
Cash flow in Year 3 = Annual Benefit + Salvage Value - Initial Investment
= 55,000 + 20,000 - 100,000
= - $25,000
Cash flow in Year 6 = Annual Benefit + Salvage Value
= 55,000 + 20,000
= $75,000
In Case of Alternative B
Cash flow in Year 6 =
= 45,000 + 35,000
= $80,000
As Initial Investment in Alt B is greater than Alt A
So we need to deduct cash flow of Alt A from Alt B
Now as Incremental ROR is greater than MARR
So Choose Alternative B
if there is any doubt please ask in comments
Thank you please rate
7. (3 pts) You are presented with three investment possibilities, however you only have enough money...
The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you. The life of all alternatives is 10 years. A В C Capital investment Annual expenses $60,000 $90,000 $40,000 $30,000 $70,000 35,000 45,000 15,000 30,000 40,000 25,000 16,000 Annual revenues 50,000 52.000 38,000 28,000 Market value at EOY 10 15,000 10,000 10,000 39.0% 10,000 IRR ??? 7.4% 30.8% 9.2% After the base alternative has been identified, the first comparison to be made in an incremental analysis should be which of...