Question

Read scenario below then answer. What are values? Do companies, as well as individuals, have values? What are Mongo's values? What are Hammer's values? How do these values impact what transpired?

Kevin Quinn was a 60-year old engineer who had worked for Mongo Project Corporation for thirty years. Quinn was approached by Mongo to work as manager of engineering on the Jumbo Project, a two-year project constructing an industrial city in Saudi Arabia. The project was to be performed by Saudi Arabian Mongo Company (SAMCO), a Mongo foreign subsidiary, for the Royal Commission, an organ of the Saudi government. The Royal Commission retained the right in its contract with SAMCO to remove or replace any SAMCO personnel at its sole discretion. Quinn accepted the offer, viewing the position as the final "jewel in the crown" of a successful career. SAMCO submitted Quinn's resume, which included his date of birth, to the Royal Commission, and he was approved for the job.

            Before leaving for Saudi Arabia, Quinn signed a "Recital of International Employment Conditions," which stated: "Your assignment is for an indefinite period; and, assuming your performance is satisfactory, the assignment will continue until Mongo advises you that your services are no longer required, in which event you will be given a minimum of four weeks written notice of assignment completion."

            When Quinn arrived in Saudi Arabia, he was informed by Michael Hammer, SAMCO's program director for the Jumbo Project, that Quinn was going to have a problem because his grey hair showed that he was "over fifty," and people over fifty were "regarded with suspicion" in Saudi Arabia. (Saudi Arabian law does not prohibit employment discrimination on the basis of age.) Shortly after Quinn's arrival, Hammer received a letter from the deputy director of the Royal Commission stating that Quinn did not satisfy the Commission's requirements and should be replaced as soon as possible. As a result, Hammer immediately took Quinn off the project.

            After he retuned to the U.S., Quinn was depressed and withdrawn as a result of his dismissal. Mongo offered him many other projects, but he turned them down. Quinn then sued Mongo Corporation, claiming that his employment on the SAMCO Jumbo Project was terminated because of his age.

Answer 1

Quinn sued Mongo Corporation, claiming that his employment on the SAMCO Jumbo Project was terminated because of his age. The age discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) is a federal law that consider illegal to terminate an employee who are 40 and above due to the age factor. The law provides the plaintiff the protection against age discrimination. In this case, Kevin Quinn who is 60 year old must gather evidence and documentation after claiming the organization and must go for health insurance as soon as possible.

The organization did not assess his capacities and aptitudes but rather just took Quinn off the venture in view of the age factor. Each representative has the option to work free from any sort of separation. No administrator or boss can fire a representative dependent on segregation. The privilege to work free from segregation applies at each work environment and in each work choice.

Be that as it may, the undertaking was situated in Saudi Arabia. As indicated by law in Saudi Arabia, 60 is considered as the retirement age. In this manner, Hammer got a letter from the representative executive of the Royal Commission expressing that Quinn did not fulfill the Commission's prerequisites and ought to be supplanted at the earliest opportunity. Therefore, Hammer quickly took Quinn off the undertaking. In the event that I were the judge, I would sue the Mongo Corporation as the end offered depended on age separation not on work execution. Be that as it may, as indicated by Saudi Arabia law court, it isn't illicit to fire a worker seeing the age factor. Along these lines, the Mongo organization can be considered as liable. The employment contract terminates at this age unless the corporation and the employee agree to continue to work after this age. Therefore, being the judge, I would advise the corporation as well as employers working in such corporation to not use age based discrimination or any other discrimination about the job performance of an individual working aged 40 and above.

2. Hammer and Mongo did not act ethically. Ethics deal with ideals. Ethics simply show you what is good or bad and what is right or wrong. Ethics determine norms, ideals, standards, values and beliefs. Ethics pass judgment of value upon human actions with reference to the moral ideal. They didn't think about his abilities and seeing the age, chose to end from the undertaking. This untrustworthy conduct demonstrates that the sentiments of people working in the partnership don't make a difference. Each association must fill in as a family to develop effectively. In the event that the association thinks about the representatives as working machines, at that point the organization can't get by for long.

I would have acted differently. After receiving the letter from the deputy director of the Royal Commission stating that Quinn did not satisfy the Commission's requirements and should be replaced as soon as possible, I would not approach to Quinn immediately to take him off the project. I would have conversed with the upper administration to consider this choice seeing the abilities and skills of the person. It is unquestionably wrong to fire a representative dependent on any sort of separation. This influences the authoritative culture inside just as remotely. If we did not understand our employees, their values and background, there would be lack of coordination between the employer and the employees.