Question

Prepare a report comparing two cloud hosting vendors. Compare their service level agreements in terms of the Key Performance Indicators. Complete the analysis with a recommendation for the vendor to use based on the analysis in the report.

I am not understanding this assignment and need help.

Nicholle

Answer 1

Consider the below cloud hosting vendors

1. Amazon Web Services

2. Rackspace

The Contender:

AWS offers below services:

• Storage (with the S3 & Glacier products).
• Databases (RDS, RedShift, SimpleDB, DynamoDB).
• Networking (Route 53, VPC).
• Deployment & Configuration Management (OpsWorks, Elastic Beanstalk, CloudFormation).
• Content Delivery (CloudFront).
• Load balancing.
• Application development platforms.

Rackspace offers below services:

• Cloud Servers: Comparable to EC2. This is the brand name for a joined cloud administration for server processing arrangements.
• Cloud Tools: the joined name for applications and administrations to keep running on Cloud Servers. So for example on the off chance that you need a PHP stack there is Zend, for execution testing there is Cloudkick, for application observing there is CopperEgg, for a MySQL database there is Xeround, etc.
• Cloud Sites: this is a PaaS offering, offering access to a packaged framework setup. So for example in the event that you need a site have server with a web server, database and email administration, you pay a fixed month to month sum for all these as a unit/group.

Pricing :

A more intensive look uncovers that regarding computing (EC2 versus Cloud Servers), AWS is significantly more adaptable than Rackspace. In EC2 you can blend and match parts from the server stack and pay for each autonomously, yet in Rackspace's Cloud Servers you are generally constrained to a decision of packaged administrations with fixed costs. Also, AWS offers a 'Free Usage Tier' for new clients; you get a little 'starter' server, however you should in any case initially give your charge card subtleties

Performance and Availability:

performance is one territory where Rackspace Cloud Server has a huge favorable position over AWS EC2. Both target outsider commentators and emotional recounted proof show that in all measures, Rackspace is a couple of products quicker than AWS. This is genuine even crosswise over various server configs. For instance, one examination found that Rackspace is 2.3 computationally quicker than EC2, and has 2.8 occasions quicker I/O.

Conclusion:

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and RackSpace both idea definitely something beyond traditional web hosting solutions, which makes this an incredible comparison. While them two are extremely prevalent alternatives, Amazon is unrivaled in pretty much every classification. Amazon structured their web benefits initially to help their gigantic worldwide online retail administration, and afterward extended it to offer the web administrations to different organizations too. They found a way to guarantee each part of AWS was remarkable and could address the issues of even the most requesting of clients, and they were effective, which is the reason they won the comparison over Rackspace.