Question

Putting aside the question of legality, what moral arguments can be given for and brand against...

Putting aside the question of legality, what moral arguments can be given for and brand against dumping? What is your position on dumping, and what principles and values do you base it on it?
Should we have laws prohibit more types of dumping?
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1
  • A argument in favor of dumping could be that some companies do not have another option in order to survive in business, they could also say that many people will lose their jobs if not done. On the other hand, companies should take in consideration the health and safety of customers.
  • A pro to dumping products in third world countries can help these countries bring in products that they may otherwise would not get.But the con of dumping unsafe products can actually kill people and be dangerous to the environment.Dumping unsafe,illegal products is completely morally wrong.
  • Killing is aganist the law and some companies are doing that without even understanding the harmful consequences.We definitely laws aganist such companies,wherein they need to be heavily fined or even shut down.
  • My position is definitely against dumping, based on the principles and values of honesty, responsibility and loyalty to humanity and the environment .
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Putting aside the question of legality, what moral arguments can be given for and brand against...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • What are 2 arguments for legalizing marijuana? What are 2 arguments against legalization? In your opinion...

    What are 2 arguments for legalizing marijuana? What are 2 arguments against legalization? In your opinion which side has a stronger argument? Why? 1/2 page And Given all of the health hazards from tobacco, drug, and excessive alcohol use, who do you believe should be responsible for the medical expenses of users? Insurance Companies or the users themselves? Please explain. 1/2 page

  • Topics (choose one): 1. We have studied the moral philosophies of Aristotle and Epictetus (Stoics). Write...

    Topics (choose one): 1. We have studied the moral philosophies of Aristotle and Epictetus (Stoics). Write a paper showing how one is a superior moral philosophy in relation to the other Use any ideas you have on any of the points they make where you can make a comparison/contrast. (Suggestions—Arist. Rational training of emotions vs. Stoic emotional uninvolvement; for Aristotle healthy emotions are necessary for moral reasoning, while Stoics seem to frown upon emotion as the enemy of serenity.) 2....

  • If someone could please help me with this question I would really appreciate it. Case 9-1...

    If someone could please help me with this question I would really appreciate it. Case 9-1 regards Jack Kevorkian and his mercy killing of Thomas Youk. Kevorkian videotaped the killing by lethal injection while Youk signed a consent statement and also uttered his consent in the videotape recording. Kevorkian injected him with a paralyzing drug, a sedative and then finally with potassium chloride (a lethal drug that stops the heart). Youk was mentally lucid and asked for this euthanasia and...

  • Suppose you are a lobbyist fighting against the legalization of marijuana. Upon what would you base...

    Suppose you are a lobbyist fighting against the legalization of marijuana. Upon what would you base your argument/case? Why are some drugs illegal and others not? What characteristics or criteria do we use to determine if a drug's use is legitimate or illegitimate? What would you do to help solve the drug issue in the U.S.? Drug and alcohol abuse cost taxpayers more than $294 billion in preventable health care costs, extra law enforcement, auto crashes, crime and lost productivity....

  • Regan thinks animals have rights because They can suffer and enjoy life They are subjects of...

    Regan thinks animals have rights because They can suffer and enjoy life They are subjects of a life (what happens to them matters to them) They are capable of caring for their young They have reason and emotion 0.5 points    QUESTION 2 Regan's view is more extreme than Singer's in this way: Singer doesn't consider the interests of as many animals as Regan does Regan's rights position means you cannot violate the rights of anyone with them, whereas Singer...

  • C Programming QUESTION 2 Which of the following statements about pointer arguments are true? Select all...

    C Programming QUESTION 2 Which of the following statements about pointer arguments are true? Select all choices you believe are correct--this question may have more than one correct answer! A. The * operator allows you to access the address of an existing variable, while the & operator allows you to dereference a pointer and access the data to which it points. B. A function with pointer arguments must have the void return type. C. Pointer arguments allow you to write...

  • 1. According to Lawrence Kohlberg, how should we evaluate people's moral reasoning? a. Ask people what...

    1. According to Lawrence Kohlberg, how should we evaluate people's moral reasoning? a. Ask people what is the right thing to do in certain situations. b. Consider the reasons people give for the moral decisions they make. c. See whether people's actual behavior matches what they say is right or wrong. d. Watch whether people act guilty when they break a rule. 2. Which objection do many psychologists raise against Kohlberg's approach to morality? a. Most moral decisions are based...

  • Background This question asks you to take and defend a position in the debate between deontological...

    Background This question asks you to take and defend a position in the debate between deontological and utilitarian moral systems, and in particular on the question of whether we should evaluate the morality of actions based on a standard of duty or one of welfare. Assignment In light of Kant's Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals and Mill's Utilitarianism, address the question of whether it would be better to base the ethical assessment of actions on a standard of 'duty'...

  • QUESTION 19 This question, and the three questions that follow it, have to do with the...

    QUESTION 19 This question, and the three questions that follow it, have to do with the following paragraph from John Rawls's A Theory of Justice. One should not be misled, then, by the somewhat unusual conditions which characterize the original position. The idea here is simply to make vivid to ourselves the restrictions that it seems reasonable to impose on arguments for principles of justice, and therefore on these principles themselves. Thus it seems reasonable and generally acceptable that no...

  • 4. Arguments in Disguise Sometimes the most persuasive argument is that which doesn’t seem like an argument at all. Song...

    4. Arguments in Disguise Sometimes the most persuasive argument is that which doesn’t seem like an argument at all. Songs, movies, news reports, advertisements: these and other forms of communication often contain hidden arguments that have a tremendous effect on how we view ourselves and the world. To learn more about where arguments may hide, read the information that follows. Where Arguments Hide The Illusion of Objectivity Personal Taste Appeals Spin Propaganda To spin a statement or event is to describe it...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT