Discuss pros and cons of pessimistic concurrency in relation to optimistic concurrency. Discuss pros and cons of explicit transactions in relation to implicit transactions and vice versa.
Pros of pessimistic concurrency:
Cons:
Huge run time
Pros of optimistic concurrency:
Cons:
Data interference is at higher risk.
Inconsistent data and errors may cause DB worse.
Explicit transactions:
Pros:
It has beginning and roll back command.
Errors can be rollback in this method.
Cons:
We have to write our own code to start the transactions.
Implicit transactions:
Pros:
It is an auto commit.
Cons:
Errors cannot be roll back here.
If the above solution is helpful to you in any way please rate it Or if you have any concerns please comment it, I will help you through
Discuss pros and cons of pessimistic concurrency in relation to optimistic concurrency. Discuss pros and cons...
ATTEMPT ALL QUESTIONS Compare and contrast Pessimistic and Optimistic Concurrency Control techniques. 5 marks Describe quorum-based protocol for distributed concurrency control. 5 marks Discuss how distributed systems are used in organizations 10 marks Discuss the techniques used to facilitate distributed query processing and Optimization. 10 marks
Discuss the pros and cons of assessing performance in quality measurement activities.Discuss the pros and cons of assessing performance in quality measurement activities.
List and discuss (three each) pros and cons of NAFTA (3 pros and 3 cons). Be sure that you include in those pros and cons a general discussion of the benefits and detriments to the United States. There should be three substantive and comprehensive pro and cons paragraphs referencing facts.
Discuss the pros and cons of technology in healthcare
discuss the pros and cons of the scope of competition
Discuss the pros and cons that surround unemployment rates
Discuss the pros and cons of labor union today?
Discuss the pros and cons of repeated measures designs.
discuss the pros and cons of media in outbreaks of disease
Discuss the pros and cons of NAFTA from a US perspective.