Eysenck argues that there are racial differences in IQ, with blacks having lower IQs than whites. He argued those differences are due to genetics and that environment is a minimal factor. Do you think there could be other explanations? What are your thoughts?
2. Do you think scientists should publish research findings that are controversial and/or that may lead some people to, in some way, suffer from those findings? Was Eysenck right or wrong to stand behind what he believed, despite tremendous criticism and threats to his personal safety?
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the answer.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.
Eysenck argues that there are racial differences in IQ, with blacks having lower IQs than whites....
A critical introduction into the study of religion. Explain why Martin treats religion as a social construct—both the category ‘religion’ and the stuff it denotes—using Kessler’s discussion of the Dao and Anselm as examples. How Society Works: Essentialism Animism and Essentialism According to some of the theories of primitive savages and primitive religion discussed briefly in Chapter 1, religion originated when ancient peoples attempted to understand and explain mysterious forces whose causes were beyond their primitive" understanding. What causes thunder?...