There are different sub-graphs of vertices of the graph G for a fixed
We need to check for each possible edges between these k vertices whether such an edge exists or not. If it exists for each pair of vertices we have a clique and if it doesn't, we don't have a clique
For fixed we have
So that our algorithm is a polynomial time algorithm which decides if a given undirected graph has a clique or not
2. For a given graph G, we say that H is a clique if H is a complete subgraph of Design an algorithm such that if given a graph G and an integer k as input, determines whether or not G has a clique with k vertices in polynomial time. (Hint: Try to first find a polynomial time algorithm for a different problem and reduce the clique problem to that problem). 2. For a given graph G, we say that...
1) Consider the clique problem: given a graph G (V, E) and a positive integer k, determine whether the graph contains a clique of size k, i.e., a set of k vertices S of V such that each pair of vertices of S are neighbours to each other. Design an exhaustive-search algorithm for this problem. Compute also the time complexity of your algorithm.
(a) Given a graph G = (V, E) and a number k (1 ≤ k ≤ n), the CLIQUE problem asks us whether there is a set of k vertices in G that are all connected to one another. That is, each vertex in the ”clique” is connected to the other k − 1 vertices in the clique; this set of vertices is referred to as a ”k-clique.” Show that this problem is in class NP (verifiable in polynomial time)...
4. Approximating Clique. The Maximum Clique problem is to compute a clique (i.e., a complete subgraph) of maximum size in a given undirected graph G. Let G = (V,E) be an undirected graph. For any integer k ≥ 1, define G(k) to be the undirected graph (V (k), E(k)), where V (k) is the set of all ordered k-tuples of vertices from V , and E(k) is defined so that (v1,v2,...,vk) is adjacent to (w1,w2,...,wk) if and only if, for...
Show that the following three problems are polynomial reducible to each other Determine, for a given graph G = <V, E> and a positive integer m ≤ |V |, whether G contains a clique of size m or more. (A clique of size k in a graph is its complete subgraph of k vertices.) Determine, for a given graph G = <V, E> and a positive integer m ≤ |V |, whether there is a vertex cover of size m...
Definition: Given a Graph \(\mathrm{G}=(\mathrm{V}, \mathrm{E})\), define the complement graph of \(\mathrm{G}, \overline{\boldsymbol{G}}\), to be \(\bar{G}=(\mathrm{V}, E)\) where \(E\) is the complement set of edges. That is \((\mathrm{v}, \mathrm{w})\) is in \(E\) if and only if \((\mathrm{v}, \mathrm{w}) \notin \mathrm{E}\) Theorem: Given \(\mathrm{G}\), the complement graph of \(\mathrm{G}, \bar{G}\) can be constructed in polynomial time. Proof: To construct \(G\), construct a copy of \(\mathrm{V}\) (linear time) and then construct \(E\) by a) constructing all possible edges of between vertices in...
Design & Analysis of Algorithms Problem . Given the formula f- construct a graph G such that f is satisfiable iff G has a clique of size 3. . Problem . Given the formula f- construct a graph G such that f is satisfiable iff G has a clique of size 3. .
Professor Amongus has just designed an algorithm that can take any graph G with n vertices and determine in O(n^k) time whether G contains a clique of size k. Does Professor Amongus deserve the Turing Award for having just shown that P = NP? Why or why not? R-17.12 Professor Amongus has just designed an algorithm that can take any graph G with n vertices and determine in O(nk) time whether G contains a clique of size k. Does Professor...
The input to SPANNINGTREEWITHKLEAVES is a graph G and an integer K. The question asked by SPAN NINGTREEWITHKLEAVES is whether G has a spanning tree with exactly K leaves. Problem 3. Show that SPANNINGTREEWITIIKLEAVES is NP-complete. Hint: There is a simple polynomial time reduction from HAMILTONIANPATH to SPANNINGTREEWITHKLEAVES.
2. Consider the following problem: Input: graph G, integer k Question: is it possible to partition vertices of G into k disjoint independent sets? Is this problem polynomial or NP-complete? Explain your answer