True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
(2 Points)
True
False
1. False as it is not the substitute, Paul Krungman even criticize this concept and other banking regulation.It was believed that self interest should be on the basis of fair and honest dealing in the business.
2. True , unethical behavior is not accepted in law and ethics are the principles that tells the different between right and wrong same is done with law ,hence unethical conduct and law are inter related.
3. d Diversity Jurisdiction as the United State Constitution allows the extend the area involving parties of two different states.
4. b. The state's Supreme Court, as it has the power to decide cases over disputes in the state.
5.c. All the answers are correct because alternative Dispute resolution means to resolve the dispute without any litigation.
As per the guidelines in case of multiple questions expert is required to answer the first four.In this case i did first 5.
Enlightened self-interest is always a substitute for government regulation. True False Unethical conduct and the law...
TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page 12 of volume 4 of the Revised Code of Washington, part 20. ___2. The United States Congress has adopted one particular approach to ethics, and made it a part of the United States Code; all United States businesses must follow only those statutes in the United States Code, and are not allowed to determine what their businesses’ approaches to ethics will be. ___3. An...
Question 11 (2 points) North Dakota enacts a state law that violates the U.S. Constitution. This law can be enforced by Question 11 options: the Federal government only the United States Supreme Court only the State of North Dakota only no one Question 12 (2 points) Missouri enacts a law requiring all businesses in the State of Missouri to donate 10% of their profits to local Christian churches that provide certain services to persons whose income is below the national...
61)Which best describes the reason that federal marijuana laws trump the state of California’s legal recreational marijuana law? Unitary executive theory Habeas corpus Establishment Clause Preemption 60) The standard of review in which the government must prove the law is justified by a compelling government interest is known as: Minimal scrutiny Reparation Affirmative action Strict Scrutiny Internment 59) he term reparations refers to: the practice of providing affirmative action to targeted populations to achieve diversity goals. the standard of review...
1. Courts historically have granted deference to an administrative agency's . This seems appropriate when applied to an agency's analysis of questions. In the Chevron case, the United States Supreme Court stated that this deference is also appropriate when an agency interprets its own and authority. Fill in the blanks with words that would best complete the passage. factual judgment regulations power staff legal 2. Under the Chevron standard, courts should defer to an agency's interpretation of law and of fact. a. True...
Cinstruction Law and Ethics the court the right to resolve the dispute? A. B. C. D. Venue Personal jurisdiction Federal question All of the above 49. Which is not a discovery device? A Request for admissions B. Motion for entry upon land C. Production of documents and things D. Live testimony in court 50. Who is usually the best individual with firsthand knowledge of the facts which gave rise to the claim on a job site? Upper management of the...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...
Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...
Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring Twenties, the schemes and scams of flimflam artists and confidence men were legendary. The absence of a strong regulatory system at the federal level to police the securities markets—the Securities and Exchange Commission was not established until 1934—aided, if not encouraged, financial frauds of all types. In all likelihood, the majority of individuals involved in business during the 1920s were scrupulously honest. Nevertheless, the...
Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...
CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...