6. Consider the experiment in Exercise 3. Suppose some of the chickens were lost during the course of the experiment, resulting in the following set of observations.
Treatment |
Serum T3, (ng/dl) x 10(-1) |
||||
Premolt |
90.09 |
90.45 |
99.38 |
73.56 |
|
Fasting |
98.81 |
103.55 |
115.23 |
129.06 |
117.61 |
60g bran |
197.18 |
207.31 |
177.5 |
||
80 g bran |
102.93 |
117.51 |
119.92 |
112.01 |
101.1 |
Laying mash |
82.94 |
83.14 |
89.59 |
87.76 |
The linear model is given as
Yi = 0 +
i
i=1,2,3,4,5.
Where Y i is yield from ith treatment
0
General mean effect
i
Effect due to ith
treat treatment
Assumptions
Data is and errors normally distributed.
All variances are equal.
No correlation between erros
Hypotheisis test
Ho: All treatment means are equal
H1:At least one treatment mean is different.
SST=25054.8972 Sum of squares due treatments
MSST=6263.7243 Mean sum of squares due to treatments.
SSE=1701.13814 Sum of squares due errors
MSSE=106.321134 Mean sum of squares due to errors.
F=MST/MSE=58.9132
P=0.00000000226
Since p value < 0.05 we reject H0
Concluded that there is a significant difference between the treatments.That at least one treatment mean is different.
6. Consider the experiment in Exercise 3. Suppose some of the chickens were lost during the...
6. Consider the experiment in Exercise 3. Suppose some of the chickens were lost during the course of the experiment, resulting in the following set of observations. Treatment Serum T3, (ng/dl) x 10(-1) Premolt 90.09 90.45 99.38 73.56 Fasting 98.81 103.55 115.23 129.06 117.61 60g bran 197.18 207.31 177.5 80 g bran 102.93 117.51 119.92 112.01 101.1 Laying mash 82.94 83.14 89.59 87.76 e. How has the loss of some chickens from the experiment affected the estimates of the means?...
Use the data on serum T3 concentrations from the experiments with chickens in Exercise 2.3. Treatment Serum T3, (ng/dl) x 10(-1) Premolt 90.09 90.45 99.38 73.56 74.39 Fasting 98.81 103.55 115.23 129.06 117.61 60g bran 197.18 207.31 177.5 226.05 222.74 80 g bran 102.93 117.51 119.92 112.01 101.1 Laying mash 83.14 89.59 87.76 96.43 82.94 Contrasts of interest were the serum T3 concentration differences between successive stages: (1) premolt versus fasting, (2) fasting versus 60 grams of bran, (3) 60...
#9. Consider exercise 6 of Chapter 2. Suppose we calculated 95%
confidence intervals for the population mean under each treatment.
(I don’t want you to actually calculate them.) Which treatment(s)
would have the widest and narrowest confidence intervals?
EXER Serum T3, (ng/dl) × 10-1 Treatment Premolt Fasting 60 g bran 197.18, 207.31, 177.50, 80 g bran 102.93, 117.51, 119.92, 112.01, 101.10 Laying mash 82.94, 83.14, 89.59, 87.76, 94.09, 90.45, 99.38, 73.56, 98.81, 103.55, 115.23, 129.06, 117.61 rite the linear statistical...