Question

1. What, according to Norcross, are Marginal cases?

	A.	Human beings who, for one reason or another, fall below some level of rationality or cognitive ability meant to set humans apart from other animals.
	B.	Cases where the eating of meat will bring about so much good, some amount of marginal suffering is acceptable.
	C.	Cases where the eating of meat is morally ambiguous, as when one kills an animal in self-defense and chooses to eat the animal which attacked.
	D.	Animals which deserve greater rights than any human being.

2. Norcross argues that claims of "natural" distinctions are a form of "speciesism," which is meant to be similar to

		Racism.
		Sexism.
		Ageism.
		All of these choices.

Answer 1

1. The correct answer is Option A. Human beings who, for one reason or another, fall below some level of rationality or cognitive ability meant to set humans apart from other animals.
2. The correct answer is Option A. This is similar to racism.