Why is it worthwhile to isolate relevant costs under the differential cost approach when the total cost approach results the same outcome?
Solution. When an organization decides to business in a competitive market, it needs to study and analyse various courses of operation to sustain for long run. General objective of any organization is to meet set target of profit along with social impact in society. To meet such objectives, an organization needs to prepare and analyse different courses of action, relevant costing is employed to determine costs involved in such action to facilitate decision making.
Differential analysis is employed to analyse relevant costs faced by an organization as it takes into account only costs which affects an alternative and ignores irrelevant costs to compute best alternative course of action. It is employed to determine which course of action holds profitable for the organization. Whereas, total cost involves all expenses incurred while operating an alternative course of action. The main motive of relevant cost is to take into account only costs that help an organization in analyzing determining and taking decision between different courses of action. Applying total cost approach, will lead to confusion and time consuming as it involves all expenses related to courses of action, though both approach results to same outcome. So, it is worthwhile to isolate relevant costs under the differential cost approach.
Why is it worthwhile to isolate relevant costs under the differential cost approach when the total...
(4pts) 19) Differential analysis is an approach to the analysis of relevant costs that focuses on the costs that differ under alternative actions. True O False (4pts) 20) Which of the following statements about sunk costs is true? Sunk costs are the result of past decisions. Sunk costs are never relevant to decisions. Sunk costs do not vary between decision alternatives. All of the above. 21) The point in the production process where joint products become separately identifiable is (4pts)...
What are relevant and irrelevant costs, and how are they used in differential analysis? Why are sunk costs irrelevant when making a decision?
Why do you think it is important to only consider only relevant costs when conducting a differential analysis? Why not consider all possible costs in your decision. Be sure to provide examples to back up your ideas. TOPIC: Differential Analysis
Under the opportunity cost approach, the cost of each alternative includes the incremental costs and the opportunity cost True False
assume the cost structure is as follows: TC=25,000+5Q, where TC=total costs, q=quantities sold. under relevant range of sales, selling price per unit is $8.00. total fixed costs are a. $100,000 b. $50,000 c. $25,000 d. more information is needed
A general rule in relevant cost analysis is: a. variable costs are always relevant. b. fixed costs are always irrelevant c. differential future costs and revenues are always relevant d. depreciation is always irrelevant
Answer these following questions: 1. Only variable costs can be relevant or differential cost A. True B. False 2. Fixed Costs which change with a decisions are relevant A. True B. False 3. Sunk costs are always relevant to decisions A. True B. False 4. In incremental analysis, total fixed costs will always remain constant A. True B. False 5. A special order should not be accepted if the sales price is less than the unit variable cost. A. B....
Why are only "relevant" costs used when analyzing a Special Order?
QUESTION 7 A general rule in relevant cost analysis is variable costs are alwavs relevant fixed costs are always irrelevant differential future costs and revenues are always relevant depreciation is always relevant QUESTION 8 The basic objective of the residual income approach to performance measurement and evaluation is to have a division maximize its return on investment (ROI) O cash flows cash flows in excess of a desired minimum amount. net operating income in excess of a minimum return QUESTION...
Enumerating the viable and total cell concentration of a population of a microbial isolate can be a really laborious task for a microbiologist. Especially when a microbiologist studies the same isolate for several years, it often becomes practical to determine the relationship between optical density (OD) and cell concentration. Once this relationship (determined by a standard curve) is determined, the OD of an isolate in a broth can be routinely used to determine the population's concentration. Why must a standard...