Why is it so difficult to estimate the effect of Government spending on the economy and how have economists addressed the problems?
It is difficult to estimate the effect of government spending because it is extremely difficult to estimate the spending multiplier accurately. The following are the reasons why it is difficult to measure the multiplier accurately-
1. Period of the multiplier- There is no one multiplier period. Each spending will have its effects over many periods going forward. What is the time period for which one should consider the impact? An year? A quarter? Each will show different impact. Should we have a different multiplier for each period?
2. Type of government spending- Government spending is not a monolith. The government spends on many different things. Spending on military will have far different effect than spending on healthcare. Spending on healthcare will have far different effect than spending on infrastructure. How should one measure on impact of all these spendings and come up with one multiplier to measure the total impact?
3. The inherent assumptions- The measurement of multiplier by itself has lots of assumptions. These include whether there is recession, how will the spending be financed?, are markets efficient? What is the monetary policy at the same time? Each of these assumotions by themselves are very big factors affecting the measurement.
4. Impossibility of expreiments- Economists can't do live experiments like a chemist. They can't stop one sector of economy and then introduce government spending in other sectors and see the impact. They can only rely on past data which itself is a result on all these levers of the economy interacting in a complex manner.
There are a few methods by which economists try to resolve these issues. These include-
1. To solve the period issue, many scientists take different multipliers for different periods, such as quarters. Others average out the different multipliers over a longer timeframe.
2. To solve the type of spending issue, many scientists simply take the total and ignore the different types. Others divide the spending into two types- spending on consumption goods such as buying cars etc and spending on investment goods such as infrastructure etc.
3. Modeling- Economists first build theoretical model and then slowly add real life constraints and conditions in it to see if it fits the available real life data. These conditions include different models for recession and expansion, different model for different type of monetary policy etc. This also includes putting conditions and constraints in statistical models.
4. Focus on specific spendings- There are a few spendings which change not because of a change in GDP or because government wanted expansion. For example, military spending changes because of many other factors and since it might vary in a normal situation also, its effects are slightly easier to isolate.
Why is it so difficult to estimate the effect of Government spending on the economy and...
Compare and contrast the effect of a rise in government spending on an economy under a) fixed and b) floating exchange rate.
The Australian Economy Discuss the arguments FOR government spending on higher education (ie why it is appropriate that taxpayer funds should be spent on higher education for individuals). Discuss the arguments AGAINST government spending on higher education (ie why spending on higher education should be private spending)
1. If the economy is at full employment, increases in government spending: A) have a multiplier effect on equilibrium output. B) have no effect on the aggregate price level. C) are primarily absorbed by price increases. D) reduce aggregate output. 2. Which of the following measures is NOT an example of discretionary fiscal policy? A) The unemployment compensation program pays out more money as unemployment rates rise. B) Tax rates are increased in the hope of slowing down the rate...
12. Consider an economy with a straight line PPF. Show how an increase in government spending paid for by an increase in lump sum labor taxes affects outcomes. Do the same for an increase in government spending financed by a proportional income tax. Explain, by add of a graph as well as an explanation, why one of these will have larger welfare effects for the same increase in government spending.
12. Consider an economy with a straight line PPF. Show how an increase in government spending paid for by an increase in lump sum labor taxes affects outcomes. Do the same for an increase in government spending financed by a proportional income tax. Explain, by add of a graph as well as an explanation, why one of these will have larger welfare effects for the same increase in government spending.
Why is recruiting and retention of IT workers in government so difficult and What are some solutions to this dilemma?
Expert economists in the economy of Bongo estimate the following: Billion Bongos Real output/income Government purchases Total net taxes Investment spending planned) 100 Assume that Bongolers consume 80 percent of their disposable incomes and save 20 percent You are asked by the business editor of the Bongo Tribune to predict the events of the next forw months By using the data given and assuming that investment is constant, if the government of Bongo makes no changes, you predict that income...
The economy is in a recession. The government increases spending in an effort to move the economy toward full employment (Y*). Money demand is interest sensitive and investment is interest insensitive. explain each step of the adjustment process, graph the process (show both “the crowing out” and the path –process– the economy will follow). How much crowding out would you expect relative to an economy wherein Money demand is interest insensitive and investment is interest sensitive and why.
The government of an economy has increased its spending and taxes by the same amount. What is the effect on investment?
The government of Pangea, a small open economy with a flexible exchange rate, has increased government spending by $20 billion. Economists argue that after the crowding-out effect on investment and the crowding-out effect on net exports, the increases in government spending will not affect aggregate demand. Arrange each statement in the proper sequence of events from first to last, to illustrate the reasoning behind this argument. First reduction in net exports due to the appreciation of the domestic currency increased...