Without external cues such as the sun, people attempting to walk
in a straight line tend to walk in circles. It has been suggested
that this tendency is due to internal asymmetries between
individuals, or that individuals' legs differ in length or
strength.
Souman et al. (2009) tested for differences in individuals'
tendencies to change direction by blindfolding 15 participants and
asking them to walk in a straight line in an empty field. The
numbers in this dataset represent median change in direction (or
turning angle) of each of the 15 participants, measured in degrees
per second. Negative angles = left turns; positive angles = right
turns.
Begin by producing a frequency distribution graph of the dataset
for yourself.
-5.19 |
-1.2 |
-0.5 |
-0.33 |
-0.15 |
-0.15 |
-0.15 |
-0.07 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.28 |
0.37 |
0.45 |
1.76 |
2.8 |
a) Normal Assessment:
Ryan-Joiner Test
Test statistic, Rp: 0.8547
Critical value for 0.05 significance level: 0.938
Critical value for 0.01 significance level: 0.91
Reject normality with a 0.05 significance level.
b) We histogram from the given data
The histogram shows that the data is negative skewed distribution i.e. left skewed distribution.
c) It is 2-tailed t test
d) From the given data
No, the mean angle not differ significantly from zero
Yes, Based on your test, is the following statement justified? "People do not have a tendency to turn more in one direction, on average, than the other direction."
Without external cues such as the sun, people attempting to walk in a straight line tend...
5.19 1.2 0.5 0.33 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.07 -0.02 -0.02 -0.28 -0.37 -0.45 -1.76 -2.8 Without external cues such as the sun, people attempting to walk in a straight line tend to walk in circles. It has been suggested that this tendency is due to internal asymmetries between individuals, or that individuals' legs differ in length or strength. Souman et al. (2009) tested for differences in individuals' tendencies to change direction by blindfolding 15 participants and asking them to walk...