What are the justifications given in favor of more government involvement in the market economy? What are the reasons given in favor of less government involvement in the market economy?
A market economy refers to an economic system in which the decisions about the investment, production and distribution are taken by the forces of demand and supply. In market economy the justifications given in favor of more government involvement is because of the primary functions performed by government discussed as follows:
1. Efficiency: The government must attempt to correct market failures such as excessive pollution and monopoly to ensure efficient functioning of the economic system. Externalities (or social costs) arise when firms or people impose benefits or costs on others outside the marketplace
2. Equity: Government programmes targets for promoting the equity use taxes and spending for the redistribution of income toward particular groups
3. Infrastructure: The government should provide an integrated infrastructure to directly or indirectly improve the output levels or efficiency in production.
4. Economic Growth or Stability: The governments rely upon taxes, monetary regulation and expenditures to enhance the macroeconomic stability and growth to reduce inflation and unemployment while encouraging economic growth
On contrary freedom is important in competitive market economy because it allows privately owned entities to compete for the consumer's money. Freedom of choice allows resource owners, business owners, and consumer’s freedom to perform to advance their own self-interest. Business acts as an engine in a market economy. It provides employment that allows people to earn money and products and services that they can buy with the money they earn. Without an efficient business, the economy would be very primitive and/or very inefficient.
What are the justifications given in favor of more government involvement in the market economy? What...
Currently, we have a mixed system. Do you feel it should be more market-driven (less government involvement) or less market-driven (more government involvement)?
In a pure market economy, A. there is no role for government. B. government intervention might be needed. C. large markets where people meet to buy and sell are required. D. all of these answer options are correct.
If consumers and businesses became more pessimistic about the future of the economy, the government could try to stabilize output by increasing government expenditures. The primary objection to this is that an increase in government expenditures have no impact on the economy. increasing government expenditures. The primary objection to this is that there are lags in implementing fiscal policy. increasing government expenditures. The primary objection to this is that an increase in government expenditures have no impact on the economy....
While traditional Keynesian analysis indicates that increases in government purchases are a more potent tool than decreases in taxes to stimulate the economy, what are some of the reasons why tax cuts might be preferred to increased government spending?
what are the consequences of the United States relying more on the market model or government model to solve poverty?
3. Which would be more expensive for the economy as a whole: a. If the government just paid the salaries of workers who have lost their jobs due to imports; or b. If the government saved the jobs of these workers by protecting their industry. Explain.
Which of the following is a characteristic of a market economy? O Private property O Government ownership of the means of production O Distribution according to need O Tradition determines the what, how, and for whom decisions
25 residents surveyed. 83% favor building a library. What is probability that exactly 6 favor, less than 6 favor, and 6 or more favor building the library.
Government involvement in business has been characterized as a pendulum: sometimes too much, sometimes not enough. Find an area of business where you think the government should be either more or less, involved. Please be explicit in your explanation by clearly defining the stakeholders (primary, secondary, social, or non-social) affected by the regulation or lack thereof. Also, please identify at least two related ethical theories from the table of ethical theories you created in Session Two. The paper should be...
What are the possible reasons why the government may make a market intervention? What are the possible implications of such interventions? How might the wedge between consumers and firms lead to market distortions?