Question

You are a Marine stationed in Afghanistan and you have pictures and video of fellow Marines engaging in various acts of abuse and torture of captured prisoners. The enhanced interrogation techniques are used in an attempt to extract intelligence to prevent an another attack. What, if anything, would you do with the evidence? Why?

Answer 1

'The absence of physical evidence should not be construed to suggest that torture did not occure,since such act of viloence against a person freequently leave no marks or permanent scar'.For me human right is first.There are certain law regarding such issue.

Torture convention implementation act of 1994

Torture victim protection act of 1991

The medical and psychological evidence indicates that the use of enhanced interogation technique freequently cause detainees sever and long lasting physical and or mental harm and may there for be illegal under US law.Given this body of medical psychological knowledge ,official who authorise these technique place themselves and those who engage in them at significant risk; namely, that in torture trial involving the war crime act and other applicable law ,courts will be presented with credible compelling evidence of harm provided by medical and psychological experts skilled in the documentation of physical and psychological consequences of torture and ill treatment ,in accordance with the internationaly accepted protocoal.Submiting the evidence is the only way of preventing violation of all the law and to protect the human right.And also CIA reported that enhanced interogation technique cause types of physical and mental anguish that are criminalised under the WCA and other laws.