answer-
yes, Duncy will succeed because James was negligent and he has committed the negligence tort in which he knew that the tree can cause harm to someone even though he does not want that but he failed to cut down the tree and cause of that Duncy suffered the harm.The element of negligence which can help to prove this are-
Duty -
A duty is simply a legal obligation. In order to be sued for Negligence, the Defendant must have owed a duty to the Plaintiff.James has the duty that he should cut down the tree so that other people do not get injured.
Breach:
A breach is a violation of a law or duty. The Defendant must breach
his duty in order to be liable for negligence. James has breached
his duty by not cutting the tree.
Cause:
The breach of duty must have caused harm to the Plaintiff.The cause
of harm was because of tree fall on the head of Duncy and all this
because tree was not cut.
Harm:
The Plaintiff must suffer harm in order to sue for negligence. If
he suffers no harm, he cannot sue. Duncy was injured on his head
and taken to hospital.
In the case, if duncy knowing that there was an electrical storm, took cover under the tree. then Defense which james can use that Duncy should not have come out of his house in the electrical storm if he knew. he must have remain at home also he should have see the condition of tree and should take shelter from somewhere.
2. James Bark had a tree in his front yard that was rotten and he had...