Come up with a hypothetical fact pattern of possible issues that could arise for this business conducting multi-state commerce. Consider liabilities, regulations, rights and privileges of the business; also, contemplate administrative and constitutional law implications in your created fact-pattern as well as sources of law. Then describe how a California citizen could bring suit against said business successfully and any counter-arguments by said business.
(Provide specific scenarios and alternative scenarios to support a particular argument, analyze, and consider all possible legal concepts that could apply to the areas of law that the fact-pattern implicates.)
You are retained by a business incorporated in Utah, who conducts business in Washington and Nevada, and internationally through an online storefront. Most of the business' employees reside in Oregon while its markets share in strictly West Coast.
Businesses from utah conducting multi state commerce is bound to creste some errors in legal compliance specifically by discrimination laws and minimum wage alws as well as taxation policies.
For example firm may discriminate employees in hiring based on nationality and race and /or age or sex as laws in Utah are slightly different from that in California. Minimum age and wage to work is both different in Jtah and California and similarly taxation on goods vadies from products to product.
As result, California workers can file classicaction suit against business in Utah for lowered wages and age for requirements as well as sexual Harrasment laws and its subsequent non compliance.
Come up with a hypothetical fact pattern of possible issues that could arise for this business...