Who are the stakeholders involved in net neutrality and how are they affected or benefiting from net neutrality
Answer:-
Who are the stakeholders involved in net neutrality:-
Net neutrality emerged before the broadband era. Today’s
internet is marked by exploding traffic on wireline and wireless
networks and a shift in the balance of power from broadband
providers to those who dominate service provision. Over the top
players (OTT) such as Google, Facebook, Netflix , Skype, Apple,
Microsoft have blurred the lines about the providers of data,
voice, and video, and have captured regulatory attention. As
telecom revenues are declining globally and governments want more
broadband infrastructureinvestment, the economic and political
arguments of the debate are evolving. Furthermore given costs and
looming regulation, various parties are finding their own traffic
management solutions, which depart from the archetypes which formed
the original net neutrality arguments.
There are not only economic and political arguments in the debate,
but heated discussions about human rights. Strand Consult has
parsed these arguments, reviewed their philosophical background and
provides the relevant counter arguments and evidence. To be sure,
human rights are important as ever, but operators contributions to
facilitate freedom of expression also need to recognized.
The report includes a case study about net neutrality in the
Netherlands. This example was seen as a crucial win for the net
neutrality movement and a possible influence to the EU debate and
future legislation. Based upon in depth interviews, the case study
describes the rule making process from the points of the different
stakeholders: operators, politicians, regulators and bureaucrats
net neutrality supporters, content and application providers and
others. The study illustrates how with the right mix of forces, a
net neutrality rule can be enacted in two months.
In the report Understanding Net Neutrality and Stakeholders'
Arguments Strand Consult has described in detail the net neutrality
debate, its different stakeholders and at least 30 different
arguments used. Here additional items in the report. If you already
know the following , then there is no need to order this
report.
how are they affected or benefiting from net neutrality:-
benfits:-
. It creates an equal playing field.
With net neutrality in place, internet service providers have
little say on what passes through the mechanisms that are used by
customers to access the internet. There are controls in place for
illegal activities, but companies like Comcast or AT&T wouldn’t
be able to change how a customer’s data is delivered to them. This
means an ISP under net neutrality cannot block access, change
services, or alter the flow of data simply because there is
something that goes on which they don’t like.
2. It protects innovation.
Although there are companies which have made billions of dollars
because of their access to the internet, they were able to get
started on the same footing. Innovation is protected with the
internet remains neutral. Big companies still have the same access
as SMBs or freelancers and this allows everyone to earn a
comfortable living or offer information in a way that best suits
them.
3. It provides everyone with a freedom of
expression.
Blogs, services, businesses, and any website that can operate
legally is able to do so and be available because of net
neutrality. There isn’t any censorship available as long as the
content being offered meets legal obligations. If illegal content
is discovered, it can be immediately reported to law enforcement
officials. Without this freedom of expression, it could become
easier for illegal content, such as child pornography, to become
more available. If a small ISP blocked access to all and approved
of such a thing, it could hamper keeping our communities safe.
4. Illegal activities are still
monitored.
Questionable content can be found on the internet if you’re willing
to look for it – and sometimes even when you’re not looking for it.
The goal of net neutrality is to provide every person with an
experience that is optimal. This means illegal activities are still
prevented, including illegal file sharing, due to the fact that
each ISP would be treated as a regulated common carrier.
5. It would classify internet service providers as a
utility provider.
Public utilities have a role to play in our lives. They provide
services that we use every day to maintain our quality of life. It
could be argued that the internet is just as essential to that
lifestyle as having water or sewer access. Utilities provide
everyone with the services they need unless a customer refuses to
pay for them. It doesn’t matter how good their credit happens to
be, how much money they have, or what kind of business they
run.
effects:-
1. Enormous amounts of data are consumed without
compensation.
When the internet was first brought to the public, the idea of
having a streaming service was unfathomable to many. In the 1990s,
internet users had a good time being online in AOL chat rooms or
waiting 20 minutes for a cool website to load. Today, there are
real-time video calls. Companies like Netflix providing legal
streaming. There is illegal streaming as well. These services are
provided for free on the infrastructure of the internet service
provider.
2. Reduced income from internet uses limits
infrastructure improvements.
There are certain businesses and high-use individuals who consume
large amounts of bandwidth every month. If net neutrality was
removed, these high-level consumers would be asked to pay more for
what they consume. This added income could then be used to upgrade
the infrastructure of each internet service provider, making it
possible for advanced fiber networks to be installed in many
communities.
3. Priorities could be assigned by the
ISP.
Let’s take Comcast as an example here. There are numerous online
streaming services that offer live TV today: Hulu, PlayStation Vue,
and Sling by Dish Network are just three examples. If a customer
must choose Comcast as their ISP, then these streaming services
could be given a lower priority because they are rival
organizations. Comcast could choose to offer the highest speeds to
the networks and services it owns and slow down the signals
provided by the competition. This would effectively limit consumer
choice.
4. Questionable content thrives in net
neutrality.
Content that some may find to be offensive is readily available to
anyone because of net neutrality. This includes items that may be
critical of personal or religious beliefs, legal pornography,
graphic videos, and items that are not suitable for children. There
are tools that can help people and families block this content, but
an argument could be made that net neutrality could “filter” it out
before it reaches the consumer.
5. Free internet access would likely go
away.
When the internet becomes a place where profitability is the
primary concern, the idea of providing free internet access to
those who cannot afford it goes away. Providers could charge
whatever they wanted and restrict access to whomever they please.
This could lead to demographic discrimination, socioeconomic
discrimination, or prioritize content to the wealthiest who are
willing to pay high prices for the fastest data streams.
6. Charging companies more just means services will cost
more.
Some advocates of stopping net neutrality suggest that an ISP could
charge a company who consumes or provides a lot of content more and
this could lead to free access to certain sites. If Comcast were to
charge Netflix more, it could provide access to Facebook to
consumers without a contract. The only problem with this idea is
that the companies will pass those charges along to their
customers. If the cost of access doubles for Netflix, that monthly
subscription plan would likely go from $9.99 to $19.98.
Who are the stakeholders involved in net neutrality and how are they affected or benefiting from...
list stakeholders involve in net neutrality and explain how.
Who are the stakeholders involved in urban planning? Describe the participation of these stakeholders from a historical perspective?
The text defines stakeholders as: “Individuals and organizations who are actively involved in the organization or whose interests may be positively or negatively affected as a result of what the organization does.” Every organization has stakeholders. Choose one of the companies below and identify three key stakeholders. Then discuss how the company caters for their interests and what may happen if their expectations are not met. A water utility company A multinational food company A local airport Please answer in...
Describe a current health policy in your Australian community. Who were the stakeholders involved in the process of developing the health policy? How were policy ideas or debates framed? Who was missing from the policy process?
who is more affected during a data catastrophe such as a data breach, internal or external stakeholders?
Explain how Information Technology (IT) promotes people who are affected by policies involved in the policy-making process
1. Who are the stakeholders involved and what are their positions? 2. What are the issues relating to business and society? What dilemmas arise for Indian business and society?
27 of 50 (23 complete Stakeholders who are affected with changes in trade regulation will normally be the ones working harder to push friendlievade rules for them. OA Not OB. Equally C. Most D. Loss
Governance essentially means stewardship of an organization's resources control of operations benefiting the stakeholders - . legal compliance QUESTION 5 A nursing home administrator decides to remodel the facility to add household-style kitchens for family dining. From a marketing perspective what has the NHA decided to do? . Create a market niche Differentiate the product : Reposition the facility Improve the facility's image QUESTION 6 Which of the following is not the main purpose of medical records? . Determine the...
Spotify the Music Streaming Company Who are the stakeholders affected and what are the ethical issues in this case? Is Spotify justified in saying it is prepared to pay but claimants will have to come to them and present a rightful claim? Or, does Spotify have the responsibility to find the artists and secure permission and pay the appropriate royalty before they stream the music? How do you evaluate the company’s claim that the system is too complex and that...